Conservtive PAC may have to disclose its donors

From a legal perspective, this is a fascinating move on the part of the Court.

Political donations should not be anonymous.

1 Like

So you admit that we are all powerful.

1 Like

Not surprising that you would find censorship something to be proud of.

2 Likes

All powerful? Of course not. Proven to have used political donation lists to harass people, absolutely.

1 Like

And be careful what you wish for, the only option remaining is to adopt the lefts tactics and see if they are still convinced it’s ok to do.

1 Like

This may mean we get to see where the Soros money is going as well. :+1::sunglasses:

1 Like

Don’t count on it. DEMs do a really good job of burying their major donors. None of it will ever lead back to Soros, even though he is pulling all of the strings.

The truly dark money is the Soros money.

Good. We should.

I’m struck by the fact that the NRA is such a big donor. Time and time again conservatives here argue the NRA isn’t a big contributor to elections.

This is bad for republicans since it will shine a light on the funneling of russian money into their campaign coffers…

Disclosing donors is not censorship, its the opposite.

1 Like

Go right ahead.

:rofl:

Except it’s not. Soros doesn’t use 501c4s to hide where his money goes.

Derp derp. Except that’s not what anyone said. Donors to liberal PACs should be disclosed too.

Another Trumpster fail.

:rofl:

How are DEMs going to “shut them down”?

Why is it that Conservatives are so afraid of letting people know where their money is coming from?

Maxine Waters provides a prime example of what happens to those who would dare support the GOP. Antifa thugs would also be likely to pay a visit to those major donors.

DEMs want the list of donors so that they can go after them. Pretty straightforward stuff.

:rofl:

What did Maxine Waters do to GOP supporters? When has ANTIFA “paid a visit” to any GOP donors?

Do you check under the bed for ANTIFA before you go to sleep at night?

1 Like