It’s not socialism… It’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Farmers or TANF… We already have offices all over the country with the appropriate signage so the farmers can go there to pick up their checks…
And that’s the problem with sarcasm. I was being sarcastic, instead of making my point clear, so instead of addressing my point you just go for more sarcasm.
My bad.
Let’s eschew the sarcasm and actually address the issue.
Farmers have long been subsidized, yes. Milk oceans and butter and cheese mountains.
But that’s the point. Our government has always subsidized farms - so they’ve always been on welfare even though they work hard, etc. (Even the very wealthy “hobby farmers” who are quick to latch onto any government program going.
But we need farmers to grow our food. As well as farmland for them to do so.
I have to disagree with this characterization of farmers. They work very hard. Very hard.
But the government pays them not to plant crops one season, etc.
So they’re on a form of welfare, yes.
But what would happen if they weren’t?
Farmers go under, industrialists buy those farms and plow the arable land under.
Eventually, there will be no farmers and no land on which to grow food.
I personally can live on chocolate for the rest of my life, but what about future generations? Are we going to reduce them to eating nutritious paste rather than real food?
Business has figured out how to manage the supply and demand equation for every other industry, they can figure it out for crops… How long have farm subsidies been around? How did we manage it before?
Creating a problem and then solving it with a temporary subsidy so that they don’t have to bear the full burden of it is your idea of socialism? Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay.