Conservative lawyers send letter urging "expeditious" impeachment investigation

Candyman · 2019-10-11T13:09:35.225Z

Blackwolf:

Smyrna:

Personal/professional…are the two opposite sides of the same coin…which makes this scenario…twice as interesting. I’m sorry if you don’t see the relevance but…I’m used to that now.

No no, we’ve been assured by so many Trump supporters that they are able to separate the personal from the professional, that as distasteful as Donald is to them as a person they support his policies and his presidency.

Unless…that’s just a bull ■■■■ smokescreen?

Logical consistencies are only used by Trumpsters when needed. Otherwise they’ll go full hypocrite in an attempt to make whatever feeble point they feel they need to make. They’re good slaves.

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:15:25.567Z

“We have not just a political candidate open to receiving foreign assistance to better his chances at winning an election, but a current president openly and privately calling on foreign governments to actively interfere in the most sacred of U.S. democratic processes, our elections.”

But it’s okay - I support the policy, not the person!

DougBH · 2019-10-11T13:22:16.382Z

Blackwolf:

“We have not just a political candidate open to receiving foreign assistance to better his chances at winning an election, but a current president openly and privately calling on foreign governments to actively interfere in the most sacred of U.S. democratic processes, our elections.”

But it’s okay - I support the policy, not the person!

The question is if the US has an interest in Ukraine uncovering corruption, especially in relation to US citizens and the granting of aid.
If yes, then that is the end of the question of legitimacy.
It is ridiculous to say that if a politician may have an ulterior political motive to their actions, it is abuse of power. Washington would be emptied out.

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:25:56.212Z

DougBH:

The question is if the US has an interest in Ukraine uncovering corruption, especially in relation to US citizens and the granting of aid.

The question is whether Donald asked a foreign power to help destroy a political opponent in order to better his chances at winning an election.

Let’s drop the bull ■■■■ notion that he did it out of some noble sentiment of “uncovering corruption,” when he’s one of the most corrupt individuals ever to hold political office.

JayJay · 2019-10-11T13:28:25.662Z

DougBH:

Blackwolf:

“We have not just a political candidate open to receiving foreign assistance to better his chances at winning an election, but a current president openly and privately calling on foreign governments to actively interfere in the most sacred of U.S. democratic processes, our elections.”

But it’s okay - I support the policy, not the person!

The question is if the US has an interest in Ukraine uncovering corruption, especially in relation to US citizens and the granting of aid.
If yes, then that is the end of the question of legitimacy.
It is ridiculous to say that if a politician may have an ulterior political motive to their actions, it is abuse of power. Washington would be emptied out.

When there is not a single instance that can be brought forward of the President asking for foreign assistance to investigate “corruption” of anyone OTHER than his potential direct opponents for the election…when instead of using official channels he goes outside of them (and then it turns out that two of those outside people are in legal hot water that might actually be directly connected to the “investigation” they’re helping with)…and then fires and smears an individual who insisted on using the properly established (by treaty) channels…then that is a problem.

Thia is some of the boatloads of context you are leaving out.

W_and_C · 2019-10-11T13:28:31.389Z

Smyrna:

Can you believe that George and Kellyanne could be so polar opposite and still live under one roof? Can you imagine their conversations and wonder…is it even remotely possible they’re civil? I’d love to be a fly on the wall and listen to one of them.

Those two probably have a steamy bedroom life …rage sex every night, lol

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:29:47.156Z

JayJay:

Thia is some of the boatloads of context you are leaving out.

Trumpism in a nutshell.

W_and_C · 2019-10-11T13:29:52.850Z

Smyrna:

JayJay:

Conway’s personal life is irrelevant.

Why would you bring it up?

Again I ask- what does this have to do with anything?

Personal/professional…are the two opposite sides of the same coin…which makes this scenario…twice as interesting. I’m sorry if you don’t see the relevance but…I’m used to that now.

But on a serious note, of course people can disagree in just about everything on how the world should be and still like or even love each other on a human level. That’s why the Ellen/George W. Bush thing isn’t a bit controversial to me.

Smyrna · 2019-10-11T13:32:21.066Z

Blackwolf:

No no, we’ve been assured by so many Trump supporters that they are able to separate the personal from the professional, that as distasteful as Donald is to them as a person they support his policies and his presidency.

Unless…that’s just a bull ■■■■ smokescreen?

One can ignore something without being ignorant of it…or maybe…some can?

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:32:24.549Z

Here's to feeling good all the time. :

Those two probably have a steamy bedroom life …rage sex every night, lol

That’s fine, I didn’t want breakfast this morning anyway.

JayJay · 2019-10-11T13:33:59.839Z

Well it looks like mission has been accomplished and the poster deflected the conversation away from the actual issues being discussed.

Kudos!

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:34:14.459Z

Smyrna:

One can ignore something without being ignorant of it…or maybe…some can?

Two sides of the same coin, you said.

Or maybe…you didn’t?

Smyrna · 2019-10-11T13:35:04.595Z

Blackwolf:

Two sides of the same coin, you said.

Or maybe…you didn’t?

Now…you’re chasing your tail…Have fun.

Bigjohn · 2019-10-11T13:36:47.247Z

Just makes me think it’s all a game to the political types and its only the little people that take the BS they spout seriously. I can imaging all of them, left and right, sitting together in cigar smoke filled rooms, reading the vitriol the partisan hacks write on boards like this and laugh at us all.

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:37:25.335Z

Smyrna:

Now…you’re chasing your tail…Have fun.

Lol you’re the best. Keep ignoring the other side of Donald’s coin!

Smyrna · 2019-10-11T13:38:59.490Z

Blackwolf:

Lol you’re the best. Keep ignoring the other side of Donald’s coin!

Thanks dude. My first toast this evening is…to you.

Blackwolf · 2019-10-11T13:41:05.476Z

Smyrna:

Thanks dude. My first toast this evening is…to you.

Skoll! Next time we’re in Istanbul together I’ll spring for Trump Tower kebabs!

Forcefield · 2019-10-11T13:43:07.971Z

Blackwolf:

That’s fine, I didn’t want breakfast this morning anyway.

Yeah gross. And I don’t believe it. If I was a Trump worshipping apologist the sex situation in my marriage would not be awesome.

Scratch · 2019-10-11T13:46:49.033Z

James Carville and Mary Matalin are the same way…Its the old pposites attract.

DOLOOP · 2019-10-11T13:50:26.337Z

Blackwolf:

Smyrna:

Personal/professional…are the two opposite sides of the same coin…which makes this scenario…twice as interesting. I’m sorry if you don’t see the relevance but…I’m used to that now.

No no, we’ve been assured by so many Trump supporters that they are able to separate the personal from the professional, that as distasteful as Donald is to them as a person they support his policies and his presidency.

Unless…that’s just a bull ■■■■ smokescreen?

Dayum.