“Underhanded” doesn’t begin to describe that scheme. His internment of the Japanese make him one of the worst presidents. Then there was the gold confiscation which straddles the line between stupid, unnecessary, and impermissible. And several planks of the New Deal were just dumb (the others I could get behind).
I don’t know about socialist. Not everything authoritarian is socialist.
Can you elaborate on the “have to do with” part? Like what you mean by it or examples you have in mind.
True, but in my opinion he was. You disagree?
Let’s go with putting a canon on it. Like the Gonzalez canon.
Because its not a sealed environment.
I thought so. If it leaks, it’s not on my property anymore, is it?
But all socialist are authoritarians.
So are all Republicans.
Its the nature of goverment. Goverment is authority. It’s why people want control of goverment.
It’s why I want to limit goverment much as possible.
To deny them of that authority.
I agree wholeheartedly. Any government.
So that gives you the right to trash other peoples property?
You’re not listening. I have no such right.
You are advocating prior restraint again.
I don’t understand the reference. Canon? Gonzalez?
You stated you have the right to let stuff from your property leak onto somebody else’s.
How we distonguish between the things that might be called “authority” and rules that layout a scheme of interpersonal justice?
It’s what civil courts are for.
That’s providing I’m understand the content of your post.
No, I didn’t. Read it again.
Good Lord.
https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/qvg01
Your history teacher should delete her account.
I don’t understand the question.
