Like any of these sick Democrats can be trusted after lying to us about Trump colluding with Russians and funding Obama’s spygate.
You act like most workers have extra money to save. Some of ya’ll are so out of touch.
1 Like
zantax
247
Most could, that they didn’t isn’t evidence that they couldn’t.
3 Likes
WuWei
248
Most do. They don’t save it.
2 Likes
IBC
250
Because CEO’s are already making high six figures and workers aren’t? Because workers will be more directly affected than CEO’s who’ve had multiple years of high six figure incomes? Because workers are more vulnerable than CEO’s to the economic impact? Because CEO’s didn’t do anything to earn bailout dollars and shouldn’t be rewarded with raises and bonuses for it when workers will suffer more than they will?
this is why this country is ■■■■■■
1 Like
If I don’t get my $20mil bonus with my bailout, you will all starve!!!
WuWei
254
Too many words. The higher up you go, the further you are from the edge.
You still don’t get it.
Keeping the 96,000 working keeps them off the unemployment and welfare payrolls.
The CEO’s bonus funds your state, county, and city tax revenues by a whopping margin. These tax revenues will offset the coming liabilities, lessening the bailout of state, county, and cities to come.
This is exactly why I don’t care. State and local governments right about now need all the revenue they can get this hands on, and I would rather it come from a CEO’s bonus than our back pocket in the form of a larger bailout.
You on the other hand, would rather pay more in bailouts because you hate rich people.
Who’s the smart one?
2 Likes
Out of touch?


How did that Russian collusion hoax from the Democrats work out for you?
That bonus also puts tax money into State, City, and Counties…and those tax revenues will offset coming needs and lessen the bailouts of those governments to come.
Would you rather pay more, or less?
IBC
259
That’s your theory. You don’t actually have a lick of evidence to support it. As soon as you provide for me a detailed cost analysis of how CEO bonuses converting to tax dollars is better for the economy than keeping workers afloat to produce the goods that Americans will consume, I’ll pay attention.
WuWei
260
You have to times it by $.09
Hourly workers should come first.
1 Like

floydefisher:
The CEO’s bonus funds your state, county, and city tax revenues by a whopping margin. These tax revenues will offset the coming liabilities, lessening the bailout of state, county, and cities to come.
So no restrictions on bailout money, is that what you are advocating?
In your scenario, wouldn’t that money that didn’t go to your CEO, but instead went into the pockets of workers… wouldn’t money have the same tax advantages? Perhaps even more so because those rich CEOs probably aren’t going to spend there bonus money… where as the poor and middle class will spend all of it… this generating more local tax money.

floydefisher:
You still don’t get it.
Keeping the 96,000 working keeps them off the unemployment and welfare payrolls.
The CEO’s bonus funds your state, county, and city tax revenues by a whopping margin. These tax revenues will offset the coming liabilities, lessening the bailout of state, county, and cities to come.
If we don’t give CEO bonuses, then states will fail and 100,000 people will be jobless!!!

1 Like
The magical trickle down lol