Yes and they even ask us to look, observe, speculate about a child’s genitals. Then some defend it and project “groomer” on the side not looking at child no no parts.
Are you sure you don’t look at young girls no no parts as they walks by you in short shorts and allow cut tops? I have seen how progs talk about women on here and my guess it you look.
Well. He faced the “second best” team in the state and pitched a 3 hit shutout. He pitched 5 straight games and allowed one run in 35 innings. I’m guessing that you didn’t research it or you didn’t think I would. Either way, you’re being dishonest. You need to be better than this.
It doesn’t. I am against that. The statement was there was no scientific reason a biologic male could ever compete against biologic females and I just provided an example of how it was possible. Nothing to do with transgenders.
You still don’t seem to get it. Whether the boy was good or not is irrelevant. Whether the team defense won the championship is irrelevant. The only thing that is relevant is that the female pitcher wasn’t allowed to pitch because a boy was allowed to take her place.
This is the intersectionality of Obergefell, the Respect for Marriage Act, and worst of all, the Title IX feminist bean counters’ War Against Boys.
When you deliberately work on cutting boys’ activities out to meet bean counters’ Title IX, boys claim to be girls because they’re no room for boys under the bean counters. This will get worse as boys are being told they are the inferior sex in schools and should not be allowed to have activities while girls have unlimited potential. We saw that during the lockdowns when girls’ dance teams continued while boys had an entire summer of baseball cancelled. They are taking away activities from boys.
The consequence of an anti-male mentality in schools is boys will claim to be girls to earn scholarships and play sport since the rules are being made against them.