Hey, look over there!
- OP, basically
Hey, look over there!
This isnāt a civil/criminal trial. There fore there would be no prosecutorial misconduct. Itās a hearing as the function of the two houses of congress one trying the case the other deciding it. Rules of jurisprudence would not apply would they?
We need to get back to racism, fascism and Russia! Which might actually happen in a day or two.
well then if trump wanted to prosecute Biden for corruption there is no crime then either. is that what you believe.
Best Answer: It is clearly outlined in the Constitution of the United States. The Sitting President is the Chief law enforcement officer of the country, So when Obama says his hands are tied, in regards to Holder and the witchunt over CIA operatives. Obama is doing what he does best LIE.
Are you still clinging to the bull ā ā ā ā narrative that Donald withheld aid to Ukraine until they investigated Biden because he was concerned about corruption?
Hoo boy.
are you still clinging to Biden is inncocent?
Hoo Boy
None of that is anywhere near as important as exposing the real truth - the horrifying persecution and oppression faced by Trump supporters since 2016. Worst of any demographic in American history!
Your only defense of the bigliest anti-corruption crusader in US, perhaps world history:
LOOK OVER THERE NOTHING TO SEE HERE CāMON LOOK!"
Hopefully weāll get to find out in a day or two. Agreed?
how do you know what is over there?
it seems that collusion and legitimate surveillance is dead but what r u clinging to now.
We donāt need a defense. Victory is ours.
It most certainly is. All yours.
Iām willing to share. I have no problem with you being happy for us. Itās a great time to be an American.
The rewards are for Donaldās adoring base, those who have endured so much pain and suffering to stand with him and support his great work.
In short, heās forever yours. I would say congratulations but your pride in being his is evident. Enjoy!
Youāll get your shot in November.
I donāt think that is correctā¦
https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/annotation16.html
The Constitution does not say that the President shall execute the laws, but that āāhe shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,āā i.e., by others, who are commonly, but not always with strict accuracy, termed his subordinates.
In support of these constitutional issues, the presidentās legal team offers the preposterous assertion that Trump is the nationās āchief law enforcement officer,ā and as such, he can do pretty much what he pleases.
There is nothing in Article II of the U.S. Constitution that suggests the President is the nationās chief law enforcement officer. The president has seven historically recognized constitutional duties. These duties are spelled out on the scholastic.com website:
None of these powers, duties and responsibilities recognizes the president as the nationās āchief law enforcement officer.ā The White Houseās own website recognizes the Attorney General of the United States as the nationās chief law enforcement officer.
Againā¦legal experts not named Bootz say he isnāt the chief law enforcement officer of the US. So I hope you donāt mind if I donāt buy into your opinion.
Sorry but Obama absolutely upheld the constitution by saying his hands weāre tied. The president has no authority to enforce the lawā¦if so Nixon would have just said no crime here and does not resign.
The attorney General is the chief law enforcement officerā¦the White House website even states this.
In my opinion, Trump supporters only wish this was true!
Are you now speaking on behalf of Trump supporters? Maybe you can chime in for us next January after he is sworn in again? Would you be so kind?
I was making an opinion statement. You seem sensitive to that. Iāll edit.
Itās funny that of my entire post, this is what you want to refute.