Why would I do that?
Itās what you feel safe with.

Itās what you feel safe with.
What an odd post.

WuWei:
Itās what you feel safe with.
What an odd post.
You drive a Model T Ford?

You drive a Model T Ford?
Getting stranger.

zantax:
Which were pretty much analogous to todays air craft carrier, being the ultimate warship of its time.
Analogous in relative size, but not comparative capabilities.
Just like a muzzle loading rifle and an AR.
Is my right to free speech not protected if I use a printer?
Thank you! Now, why are you making crap and insinuating anyone believes āthe Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing documentā?

SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.

WuWei:
You drive a Model T Ford?
Getting stranger.
Low information.

Thank you! Now, why are you making crap and insinuating anyone believes āthe Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing documentā?
Still no cogent response. At least there wasnāt an image. Baby steps I suppose.

zantax:
SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
One of those is in the document, the other isnāt

The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
Does the 2nd Amendment mention a type of arms? I know it mentions āarmsā.
Because it doesnāt mention abortion.

SottoVoce:
zantax:
SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
One of those is in the document, the other isnāt
Neither are. Sorry.

zantax:
SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
And what does that have to do with your absurd insinuation that conservatives believe āthe Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing documentā?

zantax:
SottoVoce:
zantax:
SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
One of those is in the document, the other isnāt
Neither are. Sorry.
Modern rifles and pistols are still arms.

Neither are. Sorry.
Will you be the one?

SottoVoce:
zantax:
SottoVoce:
zantax:
SottoVoce:
johnwk2:
SottoVoce:
The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.
What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif
Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.
No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.
The idea that the Constitution needs to be āchangedā to allow abortion while no āchangeā is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what Iām talking about.
One of those is in the document, the other isnāt
Neither are. Sorry.
Modern rifles and pistols are still arms.
Was a modern rifle or pistol available when the constitution was written? Does the constitution expressly list modern rifles or pistols? Modern rifles and pistols are not expressly listed in the constitution. If you see AR-15 in there let us know.
Itās all interpreting text from over 200 years ago to meet the agenda of people today. Those infallible founding fathers knew one day people would have AR-15s and would stand and salute to those carrying them. āArmsā means anything gun advocates want it to mean.
āArmsā
Will you be the one?

SottoVoce:
Neither are. Sorry.
Will you be the one?
Be the one what? To say using the āexpressly writtenā argument is dumb? Already did.

WuWei:
SottoVoce:
Neither are. Sorry.
Will you be the one?
Be the one what? To say using the āexpressly writtenā argument is dumb? Already did.
To try to argue that an AR 15 or Glock isnāt an arm?
Iāve been waiting for the one.