Compare/Contrast The Responses Between The Two Big Decisions

tnt · 2022-06-27T16:43:44.828Z

WuWei:

Then carry a muzzle loading rifle.

Why would I do that?

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:44:43.654Z

tnt:

WuWei:

Then carry a muzzle loading rifle.

Why would I do that?

It’s what you feel safe with.

tnt · 2022-06-27T16:45:16.056Z

WuWei:

It’s what you feel safe with.

What an odd post.

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:45:52.195Z

tnt:

WuWei:

It’s what you feel safe with.

What an odd post.

You drive a Model T Ford?

tnt · 2022-06-27T16:47:11.519Z

WuWei:

You drive a Model T Ford?

Getting stranger.

zantax · 2022-06-27T16:47:18.336Z

tnt:

zantax:

Which were pretty much analogous to todays air craft carrier, being the ultimate warship of its time.

Analogous in relative size, but not comparative capabilities.

Just like a muzzle loading rifle and an AR.

Is my right to free speech not protected if I use a printer?

johnwk2 · 2022-06-27T16:47:32.085Z

Thank you! Now, why are you making crap and insinuating anyone believes “the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document”?

SottoVoce · 2022-06-27T16:48:08.294Z

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:48:13.270Z

tnt:

WuWei:

You drive a Model T Ford?

Getting stranger.

Low information.

SottoVoce · 2022-06-27T16:49:27.712Z

johnwk2:

Thank you! Now, why are you making crap and insinuating anyone believes “the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document”?

Still no cogent response. At least there wasn’t an image. Baby steps I suppose.

zantax · 2022-06-27T16:49:34.281Z

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

One of those is in the document, the other isn’t

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:49:51.103Z

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

Does the 2nd Amendment mention a type of arms? I know it mentions “arms”.

Because it doesn’t mention abortion.

SottoVoce · 2022-06-27T16:50:22.787Z

zantax:

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

One of those is in the document, the other isn’t

Neither are. Sorry.

johnwk2 · 2022-06-27T16:50:24.850Z

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

And what does that have to do with your absurd insinuation that conservatives believe “the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document”?

zantax · 2022-06-27T16:51:40.704Z

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

One of those is in the document, the other isn’t

Neither are. Sorry.

Modern rifles and pistols are still arms.

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:52:52.165Z

SottoVoce:

Neither are. Sorry.

Will you be the one?

SottoVoce · 2022-06-27T16:58:57.498Z

zantax:

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

zantax:

SottoVoce:

johnwk2:

SottoVoce:

The idea that the Constitution is an infallible all-encompassing document is hilarious.

What is hilarious is you suggesting that anyone thinks that.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/da/09/85/da0985e70b72b28488d0397a039424bd.gif

Sure they do. People on here. Perfect document. Founding Father worship. Textualism and originalism.

No, we just know there is only one way to change it, well two.

The idea that the Constitution needs to be “changed” to allow abortion while no “change” is needed to allow modern firearms is exactly what I’m talking about.

One of those is in the document, the other isn’t

Neither are. Sorry.

Modern rifles and pistols are still arms.

Was a modern rifle or pistol available when the constitution was written? Does the constitution expressly list modern rifles or pistols? Modern rifles and pistols are not expressly listed in the constitution. If you see AR-15 in there let us know.

It’s all interpreting text from over 200 years ago to meet the agenda of people today. Those infallible founding fathers knew one day people would have AR-15s and would stand and salute to those carrying them. “Arms” means anything gun advocates want it to mean.

WuWei · 2022-06-27T16:59:48.746Z

“Arms”

Will you be the one?

SottoVoce · 2022-06-27T17:00:08.670Z

WuWei:

SottoVoce:

Neither are. Sorry.

Will you be the one?

Be the one what? To say using the “expressly written” argument is dumb? Already did.

WuWei · 2022-06-27T17:01:21.127Z

SottoVoce:

WuWei:

SottoVoce:

Neither are. Sorry.

Will you be the one?

Be the one what? To say using the “expressly written” argument is dumb? Already did.

To try to argue that an AR 15 or Glock isn’t an arm?

I’ve been waiting for the one.