Compare/Contrast The Responses Between The Two Big Decisions

[WuWei]

Answered. Are you trying to argure for violations by citing other violations?

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

It says “arms”. Now if you want to make the argument the AR platform is not an arm, I’m all ears.

If not, shall not infringe.

Whose definition do we use?

Any one you want. In context.

[WuWei]

After Supreme Court ruling, LA Times asks if California is 'ready' for more...

Yes.

That wasn’t racist.

[tnt]

They’ve been ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS.

You don’t get to pick and choose.

[zantax]

@WuWei

After Supreme Court ruling, LA Times asks if California is 'ready' for more Black gun owners | Fox News

Yes.

That wasn’t racist.

Talk about saying the quiet part out loud.

[WuWei]

@tnt

They’ve been ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS.

You don’t get to pick and choose.

Have they? On what basis?

I’m not.

[e7alr]

The vast majority of the public then, and now, has never fired an automatic weapon. I have, and Sneaky has, as part of our service training. Think about automatic fire vs semi-auto fire and imagine why semi-auto is superior to automatic fire in the hands of someone not trained (the vast majority, including the crazys that have shot up schools) to fire a hand held weapon set on rock and roll (auto). You can’t really significantly reduce something that is extremely unlikely to happen in the first place.

And don’t try to play me off against @WuWei in your interactions with him.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Have they? On what basis?

I’m not.

You should research it. they have,

You are.

[margaretms2]

I wasn’t playing anything. I suggested that you responded like—you know—a normal, sociable person to my sincere question, which wasn’t even provocative. It’s a minimum standard. You didn’t immediately get hostile and creepy. I love how now that’s now a point if contention and cause for more hostility. But, hey, bros before hos.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

Have they? On what basis?

I’m not.

You should research it. they have,

You are.

You already did, cite a case.

[e7alr]

When you talk to Sneaky talk to him, when you talk to me, talk to me. We aren’t the same person, how I post isn’t relative to him and how he posts isn’t relative to me. When you start going into comparing one poster’s style to another’s you aren’t debating a topic anymore, you are directly engaging the other poster about them personally instead of the topic of the thread.

Keep it on topic.

[WuWei]

@margaretms2

I wasn’t playing anything. I suggested that you responded like—you know—a normal, sociable person to my sincere question, which wasn’t even provocative. It’s a minimum standard. You didn’t immediately get hostile and creepy. I love how now that’s now a point if contention and cause for more hostility. But, hey, bros before hos.

I’m not sociable to people advocating infringing on my rights.

[zantax]

@e7alr

The vast majority of the public then, and now, has never fired an automatic weapon. I have, and Sneaky has, as part of our service training. Think about automatic fire vs semi-auto fire and imagine why semi-auto is superior to automatic fire in the hands of someone not trained (the vast majority, including the crazys that have shot up schools) to fire a hand held weapon set on rock and roll (auto). You can’t really significantly reduce something that is extremely unlikely to happen in the first place.

And don’t try to play me off against @SneakySFDude in your interactions with him.

Auto fire is for suppression not efficiency or accuracy or so I am told.

[margaretms2]

I’m not sociable to people advocating infringing on my rights.

Yeah, it sucks, doesn’t it?

[WuWei]

@margaretms2

I’m not sociable to people advocating infringing on my rights.

Yeah, it sucks, doesn’t it?

I don’t allow it.

[margaretms2]

Me, neither.

[WuWei]

@zantax

Auto fire is for suppression not efficiency or accuracy or so I am told.

You are correct sir. Although there are Warriors among us who are very adept at “suppression”, neh @SixFoot ?

[WuWei]

@margaretms2

Me, neither.

Well there we go.

[Oldandtired]

Do they have to get a background check before they can speak or print a word? How about pay a fee before they can speak or print a word?

[WuWei]

Have to pass a competency test?