Depending on how you look at it, I would say yes to Clinton. At least he dropped any liberal initiatives like healthcare changes and pretty much went along with the Republican congress.
I believe you. The non partisan Pelosi and Schiff would have taken care of it in ten seconds without even having to wait for the reportâŚwhich did not find that Trump committed any crime.
If a president done a serious crimeâŚdamn straight he should be impeached.
Being stupid isnât a crime, being undermine and manipulated by Intel isnât a crime, having affair and lying about isnât a crime.
What hurt the repugs that Starr keep the Bill Clinton in the nightly news. Personally It was embarrassed by his actionâŚStarr. Not Clinton. And so were most American people.
Being stupid isnât a crime, but it makes you wonder if he is fit for the office. Same can be said for a President that gives orders that are routinely dismissed and not carried out by his staff.
âshould beâ has to weighed against practical factors like the carnage that impeachment would wreak on the country, when the next election is basically 18 months away.
Did anyone catch this footnote?
âA possible remedy through impeachment for abuses of power would not substitute for potential criminal liability after a President leaves officeâ
Is Mueller suggesting impeachment followed by criminal prosecution?
I didnât say there wasnât any crime. I said the report states that they did not conclude that Trump committed a crime. Page 182, conclusion.
They didnât conclude that he didnât, that was just thrown in there to make clear Muellerâs biases.