Combetta Lied While Under Immunity

LouC · 2018-08-10T00:03:03.323Z

locksith0214:

thats funny its been on cspan since 2016 and you " think" it “might” be a violation. Sorry , the video is accurate. Points for a creative dodge though

What dodge?

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:05:16.086Z

Rather then discuss the content , you prefer to focus on a non existent problem.
at least you havent resorted to name calling already

LouC · 2018-08-10T00:06:33.763Z

locksith0214:

Rather then discuss the content , you prefer to focus on a non existent problem.
at least you havent resorted to name calling already

Is there a nonexistent problem?

TheDoctorIsIn · 2018-08-10T00:06:53.498Z

You know, I tried to address the content - but you ignored my post.

Here it is, if you’re unable to scroll up. I wonder if you’re going to ignore it again.

TheDoctorIsIn:

Combetta didn’t commit any “felonies”.

When is your video from, exactly? I can’t find any reference to it in Google.

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:11:39.931Z

July 7th 2016

C-SPAN.org

FBI Director James Comey Testifies at Oversight Hearing

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey testified at an oversight hearing of the FBI's operations. Members focused their questions primarily on the FBI's handling of the investigation of 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary...

TheDoctorIsIn · 2018-08-10T00:12:55.077Z

Ok, fair enough.

Now, was that Representative right, in his accusation? Or was he mistaken?

Show your work.

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:15:32.597Z

Or did you mean the felonies part? Bleachbit on a server that you admit knowingly is under subpoena

TheDoctorIsIn · 2018-08-10T00:17:37.239Z

locksith0214:

Bleachbit on a server that you admit knowingly is under subpoena

Not a felony. Not even a misdemeanor.

In fact, not a crime at all.

He could have be charged with “contempt of Congress” - but there’s no real teeth in that.

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:28:47.327Z

Pg 99 IG report
The Department entered into a letter use
immunity agreement with Combetta on May 3, 2016.
The quote below interview is AFTER his immunity gift
pg 107
In addition, he stated that he “could not recall the content” of the
March 25, 2015, call with Kendall and Mills. In sum, Combetta took responsibility
for the deletions, without implicating Clinton or her attorneys

TheDoctorIsIn · 2018-08-10T00:30:26.263Z

You’re saying that by stating that he didn’t recall the content of the conversation, he committed perjury?

How do you expect to prove that he lied about not remembering?

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:31:46.915Z

let me recap

Combetta admitted he deleted the files while knowing they were under a subpoena
Combetta receives full immunity
Combetta takes full blame but is never charged
#REVOKETHEDEAL

locksith0214 · 2018-08-10T00:34:13.265Z

It was more then perjury , it was the furtherance of a corrupt scheme.
#REVOKETHEDEAL

TheDoctorIsIn · 2018-08-10T00:36:45.901Z

I thought you wanted to discuss the “content” of your post. It’s nonsense.

I see that you’re actually just wanting to rant incoherently.

Smyrna · 2018-08-10T10:19:28.917Z

How many different people were given immunity during the Hillary email investigation? How many charges have been charged against Hillary or anyone else? This entire investigation was nothing more than a path to exonerate Hillary so that she could win the WH and had that happened, all of this would have been swept under the corrupt DC rug. Now that she lost, the deep state with in our system has done everything in their power to keep the Congressional oversight from exposing their corrupt, illegal activities. That’s why it’s all coming out in the drip, drip, drip almost totally redacted fashion. The deep state is slowly being replaced though…so now the truth, what ever it is, is finally but slowly being exposed and I’m luvin it.

dantes · 2018-08-10T11:59:34.550Z

Two people were given immunity in exchange for testimony specifically because they thought the testimony might give them ammunition to go after bigger fish.

Read the IG report. There was nothing odd about it and it confirms that the investigation was proper and thorough.

Smyrna · 2018-08-10T12:09:28.160Z

dantes:

Two people were given immunity in exchange for testimony specifically because they thought the testimony might give them ammunition to go after bigger fish.

Read the IG report. There was nothing odd about it and it confirms that the investigation was proper and thorough.

I know…using lib math.

Cheryl Mills + Combetta + John Bentel + Brian Pagliano + Heather Samuelson = 2

hindsight · 2018-08-10T12:11:45.827Z

locksith0214:

It was more then perjury , it was the furtherance of a corrupt scheme.
#REVOKETHEDEAL

#trollaccount

dantes · 2018-08-10T12:33:16.385Z

Forgot Bentel, sorry. Three.

Mills and Samuelson had consent agreements. Not immunity.

The only reason immunity was offered was to go after higher ups. If any of these low level people had been prosecuted and not the higher ups, they’d be complaining that they found scapegoats. The only outcome some people would accept is prosecution of Clinton despite all evidence against it.

Smyrna · 2018-08-10T12:35:28.997Z

dantes:

Forgot Bentel, sorry. Three.

Mills and Samuelson had consent agreements. Not immunity.

The only reason immunity was offered was to go after higher ups. If any of these low level people had been prosecuted and not the higher ups, they’d be complaining that they found scapegoats. The only outcome some people would accept is prosecution of Clinton despite all evidence against it.

https://ijr.com/2016/09/703805-fbi-director-gave-immunity-to-5-clinton-aides-who-just-happened-to-lie-and-direct-hillary-email-scrubbing/

dantes · 2018-08-10T12:56:10.153Z

Read the IG report. Starting at page 99. Much more accurate and reliable than your blog post which has several untrue statements.

Consent agreements are different than immunity.