Collusion on Trump


#127

Whenever we get lost in the endless, fatiguing rightwing ■■■■■■■■ on this–and other, related topics–I can’t help but think of this tweet (which is still up) from Erick Erickson, who’s supposed to be one of the “smart” ones. It suggests so much about where we are, and the state of this discussion, generally.


#128

Everybody…we aren’t high enough to be privy to what’s actually going on at the highest levels of our government but don’t ever forget one fact, you know for sure. Three days before the decision to indict Hillary was announced, Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton, secretly, on a tarmac and claimed what they were discussing was grand children and golf scores. When exposed, Loretta would not recuse herself. Then Comey, the head of the FBI, did something that historically I don’t ever recall being done…did the AGs job. These are some of the facts that we do know and they can’t be explained away. It isn’t normal and exposes clearly, to anybody who chooses to open their eyes…“we” have a problem.


#129

Yet those facts have been investigated throughly and no crimes have been found.


#130

Really? The potentially guilty, investigated themselves and you’re satisfied with that? I’m done here.


#131

He has maybe taught us that we don’t actually really even need a President at all.


#132

And for two years you still have zero evidence that Rosenstein is in a plot to take out the President of the United States. I’m sorry, but I refuse to besmirch our Law Enforcement officials and institutions without evidence. Now if there is evidence of wrong doing, absolutely, count me in in condemning them and demanding they are held to account. Like I did with McCabe. But not before. I was raised to honor and defend our nation’s laws and the professionals who have devoted and risked their lives in upholding them. I will not attack them just because some sleazy politician is being investigated.


#133

And maybe Fox, etc report things in a manner that is constantly dramatic and the conspiracy guys always fall for it.

Which won’t stop because it works.


#134

Could you please link to the judge saying this because it it appears you are purposely confusing this with what the judge said about Manafort.


#135

The judge who was judging Manafort’s case said this regarding the real purpose of the investigation into Manafort was to impeach Trump.


#136

That’s not even remotely the same thing as you said earlier.


#137

And another judge said it was entirely within the scope’s mandate


#138

BTW:

I love that Trump State Television tried to include this as one of Trump’s accomplishments. :slight_smile:

LOL


#139

Do you ever notice, you spend a lot of time “interpreting” what I said, while applying your slant?


#140

That’s what happens when you are consumed with hate, would be my guess.


#141

Can I take a wild stab at this?

Because there is no there there?


#142

no image…do tell…what is it?


#143

That wasn’t the final ruling or opinion in the case. That was the judge challenging the prosecutors.


#144

The man who never recanted his use of fake Soros quotes, goes “all in for facts.” Yep, everyone’s totally buying that.


#145

Yup, just look how Obama sicced the Justice department on Bush, McCain and Romney.


#146