Collusion on Trump

margaretms2 · 2018-05-16T15:42:35.969Z

BTW:

I love that Trump State Television tried to include this as one of Trump’s accomplishments.

KDMI2IW2YQ6EZGBSOG4FCRSTWE.jpg1484×828 113 KB

LOL

Smyrna · 2018-05-16T17:04:09.652Z

Do you ever notice, you spend a lot of time “interpreting” what I said, while applying your slant?

mot1man · 2018-05-16T17:16:42.285Z

Smyrna:

Why do you now get ridiculous?

That’s what happens when you are consumed with hate, would be my guess.

SimplyTrying · 2018-05-16T17:52:44.533Z

tnt:

There is nothing stopping the DOJ RIGHT NOW from pressing charges against HRC. Why do you think that hasn’t happened?

Can I take a wild stab at this?

Because there is no there there?

tnt · 2018-05-16T17:55:58.308Z

no image…do tell…what is it?

tnt · 2018-05-16T17:56:45.879Z

That wasn’t the final ruling or opinion in the case. That was the judge challenging the prosecutors.

adroit · 2018-05-16T17:57:24.241Z

WildRose:

I’m going all in for facts. If you find that troubling I can’t help you.

The man who never recanted his use of fake Soros quotes, goes “all in for facts.” Yep, everyone’s totally buying that.

Drawz · 2018-05-16T18:23:33.500Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

NebraskaFootball:

Smyrna:

…the same reason they haven’t complied with the requests for information to the Congressional oversight committee. It would expose their crimes.

The why hasn’t Trump replaced them with people who will? Perhaps it is because it is not crimes of theirs that would be exposed, but instead would place national security and human lives at risk, while simultaneously damaging an ongoing investigation? Nah, couldn’t be that. It’s got be some weird conspiracy theory, even though Republicans control every single branch of government, including the DOJ. Amirite.

because in spite of lib accusations against his wisdom and opinion for what’s good for the United States, he does not want to create a political culture of legal vendetta against an opposition candidate after the winner takes office. If the rather neutral people below him, professional FBI and Justice people do it naturally and with cause, then OK.

I can guarantee you that you libs would not be so measured.

Yup, just look how Obama sicced the Justice department on Bush, McCain and Romney.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-05-16T18:27:46.718Z

Drawz:

Yup, just look how Obama sicced the Justice department on Bush, McCain and Romney

en.wikipedia.org

Efforts to impeach George W. Bush

During the presidency of George W. Bush, several American politicians sought to either investigate Bush for possible impeachable offenses, or to bring actual impeachment charges on the floor of the United States House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. The most significant of these efforts occurred on June 10, 2008, when Congressman Dennis Kucinich, along with co-sponsor Robert Wexler, introduced 35 articles of impeachment against Bush to the U.S. House of Representatives. The House vo The K...

Drawz · 2018-05-16T18:30:16.484Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

Drawz:

Yup, just look how Obama sicced the Justice department on Bush, McCain and Romney

Efforts to impeach George W. Bush - Wikipedia

Has nothing to do with what I posted.

DougBH · 2018-05-16T18:32:10.813Z

tnt:

There is nothing stopping the DOJ RIGHT NOW from pressing charges against HRC. Why do you think that hasn’t happened?

Rosenstein, along with Sessions recusal from the Hillary investigation.

margaretms2 · 2018-05-16T18:37:09.066Z

Yeah, with his Kenyan anti-colonial trickery, Obama sicced the Justice Department on Bush, McCain, and Romney by . . . uh . . . something something something pointless failed impeachment nonsense by two US representatives five months before Obama was elected. So wily

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-05-16T18:40:45.945Z

margaretms2:

Yeah, with his Kenyan anti-colonial trickery, Obama sicced the Justice Department on Bush, McCain, and Romney by . . . uh . . . something something something pointless failed impeachment nonsense by two US representatives five months before Obama was elected. So wily

Libs are part of a hive. Two representatives is no different that every lib on the planet.

margaretms2 · 2018-05-16T18:48:34.398Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

margaretms2:

Yeah, with his Kenyan anti-colonial trickery, Obama sicced the Justice Department on Bush, McCain, and Romney by . . . uh . . . something something something pointless failed impeachment nonsense by two US representatives five months before Obama was elected. So wily

Libs are part of a hive. Two representatives is no different that every lib on the planet.

That’s weird, as the Democrats had a majority in the House and Senate then. Somehow, Bush was never impeached. Not a good sign for your “hive” thesis.

Smyrna · 2018-05-16T18:49:40.950Z

I understand. He was just privy to what was being presented, has a lot of experience, saw right through the BS, called them out on it and has given them a short period of time to produce the document outlying the scope of what they are entitled to investigate.

tnt · 2018-05-16T19:26:28.987Z

So when he reviews those documents and rules in favor of Mueller, you will say…what?

reflechissez · 2018-05-16T19:54:50.078Z

margaretms2:

BTW:

I love that Trump State Television tried to include this as one of Trump’s accomplishments.

LOL

They seriously put this one their news? How stupid do they think their viewers are? [don’t answer]

Vigilante · 2018-05-16T20:16:57.407Z

CaughtInTheMiddle:

patience grasshopper. we’ll all know when the investigation is completed and he reports his findings to congress. until then we’re all just guessing.

Muellers Mum. Cohen is going to break.

Smyrna · 2018-05-16T20:18:46.399Z

He’ll have a decision that can be read and I’m confident his position will make logical sense. It’s when it doesn’t…that I question it. Lynch and Bill Clinton secretly meeting on a tarmac, 3 days prior to a prosecutorial determination that would have affected them both and then saying all they did was discuss golf scores and grand children does not make sense and I don’t believe that.

tnt · 2018-05-16T20:24:20.869Z

Why would a Trump appointee - Rosenstein - be adverse to investigating HRC?