Clarence Thomas Has Reportedly Been Accepting Gifts From Republican Megadonor Harlan Crow For Decades—And Never Disclosed It

GWH · 2023-04-06T16:58:16.545Z

aTtEmPtEd cOUp!!!

Supreme_War_Pig · 2023-04-06T16:58:22.734Z

thinkingman:

Supreme_War_Pig:

thinkingman:

these nonsensical racist attacks are product of the leftist’s forge.

What’s racist about it?

any dislike of Thomas is racism, at least in part.

acc to the standard now.

Ah.

So nothing. Nothing about it is racist.

W_and_C · 2023-04-06T16:59:03.274Z

WuWei:

No, it’s a left thing.

I agree - except when the right does it, then it’s a right thing, of course.

WuWei · 2023-04-06T16:59:12.661Z

Everything about it is.

GWH · 2023-04-06T16:59:13.636Z

WuWei:

We can still hate Thomas though, right?

Only if you’re black or democrat.

Supreme_War_Pig · 2023-04-06T16:59:22.515Z

Thanks

Orygun · 2023-04-06T16:59:41.657Z

Or maybe because he thinks its okay for sodomy to be illegal. Thats something to hate him for right?

GWH · 2023-04-06T17:01:32.675Z

SixFoot:

All those slobbering libs acting like Thomas is the only one. As if they’re not frothing at the mouth thinking about getting rid of that intolerable black guy for a more tolerable one.

Theirs wouldn’t be an uncle Tom, though. Just a dark skinned man doing the left’s bidding.

WuWei · 2023-04-06T17:02:14.606Z

Race traitor

GWH · 2023-04-06T17:02:22.075Z

Orygun:

Or maybe because he thinks its okay for sodomy to be illegal. Thats something to hate him for right?

You guys really need to keep it in your pants. Go play with Peter.

DougBH · 2023-04-06T17:02:27.034Z

Here's to feeling good all the time. :

Nemesis:

What happens to a SCOTUS for an ethics violation?

20 years of not disclosing seems pretty egregious to me. He can hardly claim he did not know.

Conceptually, impeachment. Of course, nothing will happen here.

Yes. Nothing illegal was done, but surely this will cause enough Republican senators to vote to remove Thomas so that Biden can replace him with a leftist judge and defeat what they have been working to accomplish for decades.
Or, if that doesn’t happen, maybe he should keep better records.

Orygun · 2023-04-06T17:03:41.322Z

GWH:

Orygun:

Or maybe because he thinks its okay for sodomy to be illegal. Thats something to hate him for right?

You guys really need to keep it in your pants. Go play with Peter.

Tell that to Thomas- he’s the one who brought it up.

Thomas: For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous"

Business Insider

What is Lawrence v. Texas? The Supreme Court precedent Justice Clarence...

In 2003, the US Supreme Court overturned a Texas statute that criminalized sodomy, ruling that it violated the constitutional right to privacy.

W_and_C · 2023-04-06T17:03:54.159Z

DougBH:

Here's to feeling good all the time. :

Nemesis:

What happens to a SCOTUS for an ethics violation?

20 years of not disclosing seems pretty egregious to me. He can hardly claim he did not know.

Conceptually, impeachment. Of course, nothing will happen here.

Yes. Nothing illegal was done, but surely this will cause enough Republican senators to vote to remove Thomas so that Biden can replace him with a leftist judge and defeat what they have been working to accomplish for decades.
Or, if that doesn’t happen, maybe he should keep better records.

That’s also true even if something (or many things) illegal were done.

PeterGriffin · 2023-04-06T17:04:07.283Z

GWH:

You guys really need to keep it in your pants. Go play with Peter.

Ooo! Nice double entendre!

Supreme_War_Pig · 2023-04-06T17:06:37.658Z

Meh. It was alright.

WuWei · 2023-04-06T17:08:08.582Z

Orygun:

Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous"

Is he wrong?

thinkingman · 2023-04-06T17:16:28.020Z

Here's to feeling good all the time. :

Depending on what one’s side of the political aisle happens to be, it’s usually “racism” when it’s beneficial to their side - and it’s “race card” when alleged by the other side.

no you’re confused, and with good reason due to the (double) standard

it’s not “usually” when it comes from the left it’s “always” racism if you dont conform.

but it’s “never” racism when they relentless lie and attack a person of color.

if you need some examples lemme know. or just watch 20 milliseconds of msnbc

W_and_C · 2023-04-06T17:19:02.888Z

thinkingman:

Here's to feeling good all the time. :

Depending on what one’s side of the political aisle happens to be, it’s usually “racism” when it’s beneficial to their side - and it’s “race card” when alleged by the other side.

no you’re confused, and with good reason due to the (double) standard

it’s not “usually” when it comes from the left it’s “always” racism if you dont conform.

but it’s “never” racism when they relentless lie and attack a person of color.

if you need some examples lemme know. or just watch 20 milliseconds of msnbc

I am saying it comes in bad faith from both sides. Isn’t that easy to see ?

You just gave a good example by alleging a few posts ago that Anita Hill allegations were

thinkingman:

actually racism

WorldWatcher · 2023-04-06T17:28:13.155Z

DougBH:

Yes. Nothing illegal was done, …

LII / Legal Information Institute

5 U.S. Code § 7353 - Gifts to Federal employees

Actually it is illegal under 5 U.S. Code § 7353 - Gifts to Federal employees.

What could be done about it is a different question.

WW

Nemesis · 2023-04-06T17:28:31.439Z

Lmao yeah fair point.