And there’s the bull ■■■■ syllogism you’re basing the poll on. If you’re arguing she has the right to abort in the 1st trimester it simply doesn’t follow she has the right up until the 9th month “because she is inhabited.”
I already told you twice I will entertain your offer of an additional poll question. Nothing. You are whinging.
My preferred outcome?
What’s my preferred out come? No need for another abortion? That’s not going to happen. This isn’t about an outcome, this is about putting your money where your mouth is about rights. About morality.
If you aren’t going to vote, why are you here? To criticize me? Try the Stormy thread.
Yeah… it is almost as if the issue is between two equal and opposing moral rights and the only thing that makes any real sense is a compromise where rights shift over time or something.
Problem with politics these days is not enough people seem capable of recognizing that fundamental reality of existence when it comes to hot button issues like abortion.
And if the point is to reduce abortion then there are plenty of things that social spending could do that would lead to reducing unwanted pregnancies but we can’t do that because that costs money.
It is a demand on the taxpayers. A demand that the unborn don’t make yet… thus the perfect group to advocate for.
“At what stage of gestation does a woman’s right to decide her own reproductive destiny become complicated such that the State may now impose its will on her?”
What “Roe v Wade option”? The option that takes away a woman’s right to choose while her body is still inhabited? Do you not understand the entire premise?