China becoming the new humanitarian force in the world

[westaussie]

Who needs/wants clean air and clean water?

[acsirip]

@AlexMcAlpine

The WHO helped needy countries with health care. Now that the US no longer funds them, China has stepped into the breach, according to the article in the link below.

They’re also helping out in the Middle East.

But this was the goal, right? America first, go to hell globalists. Rip the TPP, the paris agreement. Wouldn’t be great to leave the UN altogether? Many trumpsters want that.

Who will fill in the gap? China.
Im sorry, but Trumpsters don’t get to complaint about this. This is what they wanted, now deal with it.

[acsirip]

Care to share a link?

[mobulis]

@WildRose

And you remain completely wrong.

The EPA, Clean Air, Clean Water Acts and similar Regulations have driven more manufacturing from the US than all other factors combined.

So smog and acid rain are good for you then.

[WildRose]

The people who owned, operated, and worked for those businesses/industries need them as much as anyone else.

There can be a balance between the two.

[WildRose]

You can start here:

US EPA To Review Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act In Search Of "Regulatory...

Clean Air Act (CAA) | History & Effects

The Assault on Coal and American Consumers

Unless we can find a way to find that happy medium and/or replace mostt industrial energy production with Nuclear and Natural Gas this will continue.

A recent ruling by the courts will pretty much drive most if not all remaining pulp mill production out of the US as well unless the SCOTUS intervenes.

DC Circuit Calls for More Pollution Control at Pulp Mills

[Oryx]

@WildRose

Germany’s declaration did not force us to put a single troop on the ground or in the skies over Europe or Africa.

We didn’t even have to directly involve ourselves in the battle of the Atlantic either, we could have simply supplied GB with all the necessary hardware and ordnance to do the job themselves and remained otherwise neutral with the exception of protecting our own waters, harbors, and shores against the German Naval threat.

Okay. Not sure what your point is. Whether we put boots on the ground in Europe or not, we were still at war with Germany.

[WildRose]

Only on paper if we didn’t engage. That’s the point.

[Oryx]

@WildRose

Only on paper if we didn’t engage. That’s the point.

Japan attacked the United States in real life, not on paper. Germany and Japan were allies. Germany declared war on the United States. You really think we could have just ignored the whole situation and it would have gone away?

[WildRose]

Blah, Blah, Blah.

Whether we were officially at war with Germany or not based on that declaration is irrelevant if we’d never engaged them.

We could have simply supplied the allies leaving it to them to defend the Atlantic on their own as well as Africa and Europe while we protected our own Gulf/Atlantic waters while prosecuting the war in The Pacific.

Germany wasn’t going to move any of their assets to the Pacific to assist Japan while engaged with Stalin, Churchill and the rest of the allies. He never had the Naval forces nor air forces to do so.