Yeah . . .
AI is gonna be real big but the tiny subpart known as Chat GPT
is not honest
For your convenience here are the actual links
My number one top news story for the year 
3 Likes
From the NYTimes article
A lawyer representing a man who sued an airline relied on artificial intelligence to help prepare a court filing. . . .
I’m gonna take a wild guess and say the fictitious imaginary made-up court cases made the airline look guilty. (My evidence is that the lawyer for the plaintiff used them.)
Imagine that a subset of artificial intelligence that completely fabricated bogus information to make a big bad corporation look bad.
Could it have anything to do with the agenda of the man in charge?
I have read that ChatGPT is going to cause people to lose their jobs.
I guess that means people who rely on it to provide accurate information.
1 Like
Fallen Man make AI in his image … expect the AI to be a liar.
“Cheating? Why that identical situation occurred in the New Hebrides Open! Kaduffle plays Fuddel in 19 ought 18. And what about Frantis vs Skinfritter? Heh! Pismo vs Sturgeon in the Casablanca Amateur? Cheating indeed!” – Bugs Bunny
1 Like
Maybe someone should program an AI to make up fact checks of it?
Anyone who relies on ChatGPT to provide accurate information deserves to lose their job - the same way that someone who relies on a Magic 8-Ball to make “accurate” decisions.
Imagining intention on the part of a computer program is silly. ChatGPT is a toy, not an authority - anyone who relies on it should righfully lose their job.
1 Like
AI isn’t gonna end the world. But laziness might.
2 Likes
Mark this day down in history.
Conan actually liked his post.
Just goes to show that lawyers are ■■■■■■■ stupid too.
3 Likes
Yes anything ChatGPT says might be a toral and deliverste fabrication.
Legalky its creator should have told every single investor and every single subscriber"We are not even goong yo try to tell the truth. We are giing to make up complete lues as pass them off as truth."
Anything ekse is consumer FRAUD or securities FRAUD no different than the blood test machine that did not actually test anything at all.
No different than a driveway repairman who does not repair your driveway, just paints it.
All what AI is doing is encouraging laziness.
Yeah a guy once sold chicken breast but told the buyer it was Swordfish steak.
His defense
“It does not matter that I lied.
They were too lazy to check.”
1 Like
Outstanding!
Forbes Article below notes that Google’s soon-to-launch competing product (called “Bard”) has “similar problems.” My guess is that since Google is ad-driven, when/if Bard complete fabricates something and passes it off as true it is probably to the benefit of its advertisers.
Sadly, the lawyer used the AI chatbot ChatGPT, which completely invented the cases out of thin air. . .
In fact, Schwartz said he even asked ChatGPT if the cases were real. The chatbot insisted they were. . . .
The chatbot is part of a family of new technologies called generative AI that can hold conversations with users for hours on end. The conversations feel so organic and normal that sometimes ChatGPT will seem to have a mind of its own. But the technology is notoriously inaccurate and will often just invent facts and sources for facts that are completely fake. Google’s competitor product Bard has similar problems. . . .
Here is a list of Google’s top 20 ad-spenders link below shows the entire100.
I notice that Lowe’s (home supply) and Progressive (insurance) are on the list but Home Depot and Esurance are not. I am wondering, if it is okay for AI to completely fabricate false claims and fictitious lawsuits, (the only crime is that the users are too lazy to fact check) . . . .
.
1.) Would it be okay for Google Bard to completely make up a bunch of phony lawsuits about Home Depot and Esurance so that people don’t buy from them?
.
2.) If that is not okay obviously Home Depot and Esurance would have a legal case against Google Bard, but, would Google Bard subscribers also have a case? After all they paid $20/month for a service that did nothing except lie and defraud them into over-paying for stuff?
The Schwartz was with ChatGPT.
Problems happened.
How do we know the story is real?
