Charlie Cook moves Texas to Tossup

[SottoVoce]

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

So, the video was made illegally and ultimately showed no wrongdoing on the part of Planned Parenthood.

The first is irrelevant to the content.

Showed no illegal acts maybe? “Wrongdoing” most definitely.

If you want to use “wrongdoing” as a subjective term relating to personal beliefs, have at. “Wrongdoing” defined in the legal context refers to “injurious, criminal, or improper behavior.” There was no legal wrongdoing.

There we go. I will agree with “legal”. Not improper behavior nor injurious.

Still haven’t proven any of the content to be false or fabricated.

When it comes to Planned Parenthood, I don’t have to. 13 states and the House Oversight Committee already did.

When it comes to the Omar video, I don’t have to. The only two names sources already did.

When it comes to the Texas video, I don’t know. I have no reason to believe it is true until verified.

[WuWei]

No it wasn’t. The Planned Abortionhood explanation of the sale was accepted as legal. They were most definitely profiting from it.

Claiming they were “breaking even” in no way changes that fact.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Still haven’t proven any of the content to be false or fabricated.

Their premise for the videos were that PPH were engaging in illegal activity. They were in fact not engaging in illegal activity. Therefore the video and its premise… is untrue. False. Wrong.

If their premise was that PPH performed Abortions. Then the videos would have some accuracy to them.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

The Planned Abortionhood

And this is when the argument was truly lost

[SottoVoce]

@WuWei

No it wasn’t. The Planned Abortionhood explanation of the sale was accepted as legal. They were most definitely profiting from it.

Claiming they were “breaking even” in no way changes that fact.

Fine. Prove it. Make an accusation, back it with verifiable evidence.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Still haven’t proven any of the content to be false or fabricated.

Their premise for the videos were that PPH were engaging in illegal activity. They were in fact not engaging in illegal activity. Therefore the video and its premise… is untrue. False. Wrong.

If their premise was that PPH performed Abortions. Then the videos would have some accuracy to them.

The premise may not have been proven. The video is not false.

Trying to throw the baby out with the bandages? Tsk, tsk.

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

@WuWei

No it wasn’t. The Planned Abortionhood explanation of the sale was accepted as legal. They were most definitely profiting from it.

Claiming they were “breaking even” in no way changes that fact.

Fine. Prove it. Make an accusation, back it with verifiable evidence.

It’s in the court case, they admitted to charging.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

The premise may not have been proven. The video is not false.

If the premise is not proven… then what is the point of the video then?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

The Planned Abortionhood

And this is when the argument was truly lost

There is no argument.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

There is no argument.

Finally a nugget of truth.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

The premise may not have been proven. The video is not false.

If the premise is not proven… then what is the point of the video then?

To shine a light on immoral and barbaric dehumanization practices.

To generate outrage to force a change in the law.

To bring evil out of the shadow.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

There is no argument.

Finally a nugget of truth.

Every post I make

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

To shine a light on immoral and barbaric dehumanization practices.

To generate outrage to force a change in the law.

To bring evil out of the shadow.

Well you made up a better premise than the creators had. Maybe you should join Project Veritas?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Every post I make

[wonderingrover]

@Safiel

In 2022, Hispanics will become the largest ethnic plurality in Texas, moving past non-Hispanic Whites. Sometime in the 10 to 15 years after that, Hispanics will become the outright majority of the Texas population.

It is actually survivable for the GOP in Texas, but ONLY if they change their tune and quickly.

Lose the voter suppression bull ■■■■■

Lose the anti-immigrant orthodoxy.

It is possible for the GOP to perform decently among Hispanics, but not with some of the current garbage they are pushing or preaching.

The irony is that they were well on their way to doing that in 2015 before Trump started his hostile takeover. Now, after 4 years of Trump’s ■■■■■■■■ , it may not be possible to regain that ground for at least a generation

[WuWei]

Did the Planned Abortionhood woman say she needed money for a sports car in the context of baby parts yes or no?

Did Raquel Rodriguez put a price on havested ballots yes or no?

[WuWei]

@wonderingrover

it may not be possible to regain that ground for at least a generation

a generation!

[SottoVoce]

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

@WuWei

No it wasn’t. The Planned Abortionhood explanation of the sale was accepted as legal. They were most definitely profiting from it.

Claiming they were “breaking even” in no way changes that fact.

Fine. Prove it. Make an accusation, back it with verifiable evidence.

It’s in the court case, they admitted to charging.

Sure. Charging what is allowed by law for the maintenance of the fetuses.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/289g-2

The term “valuable consideration” does not include reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.

Only two Planned Parenthood locations participate in tissue donation. One charges $60, one doesn’t charge anything. Four affiliates which no longer participate either charged nothing or $45-55 per specimen.

PPFA_Letter_to_Congressional_Leadership.pdf

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

Sure. Charging what is allowed by law for the maintenance of the fetuses.

Glad we could agree. Selling baby parts.

Have a nice day.

[biggestal99]

@WuWei

I also believe that the videos @SixFoot posted, as well as the Planned Babymurderhood are true

Proof?

Or is that just your opinion?

As we all well know videos can and are manipulated.

Confirmation bias perhaps?

Allan