How many times does Project Vertias need to be caught manipulating videos to create a false narrative before their credibility comes into question?

Literally every “project” they’ve ever done has been made up. They are zero for 12.

But you can go ahead and still believe them. It confirms your bias.

So what you’re really saying, is you didn’t see her caught on camera, because it’s a source that goes against your bias. You could’ve just said that in the first place. :wink:

I don’t think that’s correct. Their methods have been found to be illegal. That is not the same as “content made up”.

They have a great track record. Remember the Ilhan Omar Project Veritas video that had everyone up in arms? Wonder why nothing came of it and why we haven’t heard anything since?

In his first interview, Liban Osman tells the FOX 9 Investigators he was offered $10,000 by community activist Omar Jamal to say he was collecting ballots for Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.

“He was setting me up,” said Liban Osman.

1 Like

Good deflection. That article is proof that this woman did not in fact get caught on camera.

Deny, lie and make counter accusations.

Deflection? Project Veritas has already made a fictitious video about paid ballot harvesting. They release another video about paid ballot harvesting a few months later and people take it as true?

Whatever fits the narrative. Outrage first, look to verify later. I would think people would be a bit more suspicious given Project Veritas’ track record, but whatever. This will be forgotten as quickly as their other “work.”

Where?

Everybody should think like you. :wink:

The Project Veritas modus operandi.

Wait for objective verification before spewing disinformation? I’d hope so.

1 Like

Already gave the link.

I was set up! Offered a bribe!

That claim proves… what?

I am waiting for objective verification, but all I’m getting is squeals and oinks from the left. :man_shrugging:

Read it. The link cites an interview with Omar Jamal, the guy at the center of the Project Veritas video saying it never happened.

And that proves what? That somebody else offered him $11,000?

The Project Veritas video was fabricated. The “insider,” Omar Jamal, used in the video says no paid ballot harvesting ever happened. Liban Osman, an individual shown in the videos says the footage of him was taken out of context. He was offered a bribe to say things which are not true out of context. He collected ballots for Omar but he was picking up ballots from sick and elderly voters and was not paid. Project Veritas used the footage to make it appear as if he was being paid to collect votes.

The insider says it isn’t true. The ballot harvester says it isn’t true. The video is a fabrication.

Because one guy changed his mind? An “insider” in the scheme? Why do you believe him?

What do the people on the video say?

I’m not saying it is true, I’m saying you haven’t proved it’s not.

The baby parts video is another example. They got in trouble for how they got the video. That doesn’t make what was videoed false. Process crime, not fabricated content.

Ah. I see we are in the believing in Project Veritas stage of grief.

8 Likes