WuWei
161
Good. You’re welcome.
Are you criticizing The Bell Curve? I’m asking because your posts seem to suggest that.
Smyrna
162
…and now, let us all consider the opposite culture found in Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, St. Louis, Los Angeles…and recognize the same thing Charles Murray said…but in reverse.
WuWei
163
I haven’t finished it yet, so no. I’m might get to the last page and it says “Minorities are stupid” so I won’t be able to.
So far, it’s not what I was led to believe by those who obviously haven’t read it.
tnt
164
What difference does it make, you haven’t read it.
WuWei
165
I’ve opened it. I’m working on it. I’ve read some of it. I own it. You?
tnt
166
Sure, sure. I understand.
Spoiler: he doesn’t say out loud what he wants you to say in your head. It’s more a subtle psychological thriller than a fast paced action book.
Charles Murray’s entire worldview is that IQ is destiny for a five race theory that doesn’t even exist.
1 Like
WuWei
168
Is that what you read about it?
Biden = “Poor kids are just as smart as white kids.” Then the dem elected this racist …
3 Likes
tzu
171
The problem with IQ tests is context.
Smyrna
173
The opposite of two parents being involved in raising, guiding and equipping the children they brought into this world, into adulthood.
WuWei
174
Ah, now you have a completely different argument. And in my opinion a valid one.
As they clearly state, it was the available common denominator, as imperfect as it is.
What is your context argument?
tzu
175
Too vague. Be specific. Plus, two parents is not a ‘culture’. It’s a statistically measurable outcome.
Smyrna
177
The culture is the bi-product of so many living in a close, geographical radius, that influences the behavior, that then repeats itself from generation to generation and exacerbates that behavior into the violence that’s now happening in the inner cities throughout the country.
1 Like
tzu
178
Same argument, different approach. IQ tests for a very narrow competence. A competence a specific kind of elite would rather not have to admit is trained, prepatory and contextual: i.e., for a group of people with a resource base that allows for an abstraction of problem solving.
And even that misses important elements of intelligence, as this article will explain better than I:
tzu
179
Oh, you’re peddling hogwash. Sorry, I thought you might make an argument about rationality, resources and the legal framework that distributes them.
tzu
180
It’s not like it could be any other way.