Can we find a better word for "DEPORTATION?"

I don’t have to, you’ve spoken for yourself plenty.

1 Like

No, in this case the arbiter is the Constitution, which you want to ignore when it’s not convenient.

So, you see yourself as the self-appointed arbiter of the Constitution.

As has everyone else in this forum.

Not at all. The Constitution is clear. Here, I’ll quote the 14th amendment since you seem to be unfamiliar with it:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

For emphasis: nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

:man_shrugging:

Back to your soap box.

What exactly do you expect to happen? Do you honestly believe there will be an epiphany and that I will suddenly begin agreeing with you.

Literally quoting the Constitution is a problem for you. :sweat_smile:

Certainly not. You’re way too far down the rabbit hole. But I will continue to point out to you and this board that you believe the Constitution can be ignored or openly violated when it isn’t convenient for your preferred political party.

You are on a fool’s errand. Do you honestly believe there is anyone in this forum who doesn’t know where I stand? Do you honestly believe that you will sway anyone’s opinion one way or the other?

1 Like

Nope, you’ve made your authoritarian boot-licking quite clear. But I’ll keep pointing it out just the same.

1 Like

Did you miss the super secret clause that as long as you type mistake in all caps it’s all good?

2 Likes

Not a secret, but it is short and to the point.

its a problem for all of MAGA who dont think ALL persons are covered by the 5th and 14th amendments.

Allan

And completely ■■■■■■■■■

Actually, it’s pretty concise.

It actually isn’t a problem at all.

The “MISTAKE” excuse doesn’t fly here. It was a stupid argument in the Garcia thread and it doesn’t apply at all to the people we’re paying El Salvador to incarcerate. So like I said, ■■■■■■■■■

What part of the Constitution should we ignore next?

Says who? You?

Feel free to ignore whatever part you see fit.