Cambridge Analytica ran voter suppression campaigns, whistleblower claims

The biggest tent.

Fake News CNN. They’re not doing so good in their ratings compared to Fox.
I wonder why? lol.


not surprising though.

I know right? People are actually starting to think for themselves more, and less of what the Socialist part of our government tell them to think. There’s also the biased liberal news, that has been around since a long time before Fox.


Wylie did not provide specific evidence of voter suppression campaigns taking place in the US.
Hey I know it was done, but I’m not going to point to any one campaign


“Mr. Bannon sees cultural warfare as the means to create enduring change in American politics. It was for this reason Mr. Bannon engaged SCL (Cambridge Analytica’s parent company), a foreign military contractor, to build an arsenal of informational weapons he could deploy on the American population,” Wylie claimed, referring to Trump’s former top political adviser Steve Bannon.

And yet Mr. Whistleblower did NOTHING during the campaign to bring it to light? Really?

Or does he claim to have learned of this arsenal AFTER the election?

I’m sure if he’s lying he can be sued for defamation, no?

Just find it highly interesting.

Didn’t provide any specifics, yet seems to know a lot.

And if a person can be persuaded not to vote by internet advertisements . . . . .

Why do you think none of these people you call liars are ever taken to court for lying?

Wylie did not provide specific evidence of voter suppression campaigns taking place in the US.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! :joy::rofl::sweat_smile::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Wylie did not provide specific evidence of voter suppression campaigns taking place in the US.

I’m sure he’ll be sued for defamation then, right?

That’s a question more appropriately asked of those who have standing to sue.

That’s a lame deflection, btw.

It’s not a deflection at all. You called him a liar. He’s clearly not. I’m pointing out why it’s obvious he’s not lying. If he gets sued for accusing a group already proven to have violated the law, then we can revisit. But we won’t have to.

Where did I call him a liar?

Your lies aren’t the same as systematic voter suppression. You would sue somebody if they falsely accused you of rigging a presidential election by depriving black citizens of their vote, correct? I would.

In your post. Now you’re backtracking because you know I’m right and you are embarrassed.

There’s my post. Where did I call him a liar?

Would you like to change your answer and say that you believe Wylie is telling the truth now? Because I also think he is telling the truth.

this guy never deflects anything at all ever!

There’s my post again. Where did I say that he was lying, that I would need to change it?

If you don’t understand the intent of my post, it’s better to ask than to ASSume.

I which the joker would come back and play. I hope that I didn’t embarrass him? If I did, I really do apologise. I was growing quit find of that guy.