Camp
21
Funding on a national level would be more difficult as would the oversight on spending.
Camp
22
No No No No.
Lead the way California.
Otherwise Iâm thinking its a scam.
KiddingâŠI know its a scam.
2 Likes
Thankfully thereâs no enumerated power for it.
1 Like
WuWei
26
Not counting unfunded liabilities.
3 Likes
Fee schedules. They are useful
Which is standard. Even Texas doesnât count unfunded liabilities.
Camp
29
It gets even better moving forward.
Now TWICE and once during a pandemic California could not even muster a VOTE or put up a PROJECTED cost analysis. There is no way to make a move to the federal level. The argument will beâŠ
Why did California fail so miserably with it?
WuWei
30
Look at them! 
âWe have to have it national!!!â
Same exact excuse they use for gun control.
2 Likes
I thought it was supposed to be so much cheaper⊠and free for many people. This doesnât make sense.
2 Likes
Letâs look at big statewide projects, shall we? Iâll begin. Howâs that high speed rail coming along? You know⊠progress, current status, budget-wise?
2 Likes
Look at whom? You havenât come out in possible favor of a national plan subject to conditions?
Since when does state level failure indicate that it canât be done on a national level except this time? What other policies can we project this onto?
Right thatâs not how any of this works despite the sale tactics.
WuWei
36
Yâall. You©, you.
Sure. Iâm willing to listen to practically anything. Except weak-assed excuses.
1 Like
The excuses have nothing to do with a national level plan. But okie dokie.
WuWei
38
If the national plan you© want is done like everything else and fails, will you cry âWe need it global!â like socialists always do?
2 Likes
2 are being built. One private, one government.
Seems to be doing ok. Itâs hard to work with California terrain an population density. Really if flyover country had more interest and money⊠they should have built the railroads.
By they are broke and depend on CA⊠so here we are.