828

The Arizona Supreme Court ultimately ruled the “certified” Governor out for the runner up back then.

Precedence shows the path where Lake and her lawyers are currently citing as relevant.

https://arizonasuntimes.com/2022/12/08/arizona-faced-a-similar-contentious-gubernatorial-race-in-1916-that-dragged-out-with-accusations-of-voter-fraud/

1 Like
829

First that I have read this. There certainly are some parallels.

1 Like
830

There are zero parallels.

The margin was 30 votes.

The argument was over how to interpret ballots that were marked both “straight party” but yet had the opposing candidate (Hunt) marked.

The evidence under examination was cut and dried, even if the interpretation of that evidence was not.

Finally, Campbell was seated knowing he might be told to step down later.

There is nothing like that here.

831

Parallels are both election results were / are being contested by the candidate behind as permitted by law.

1 Like
832

So both are lawsuits.

That’s quite a precedent you cite.

833

Thank you. Pointing out the obvious that candidates have legal rights to contest results. And although rare some of these disputes work out in favor of the person who petitioned the courts.

1 Like
834

This is America.

Anyone can sue anyone, for any reason.

835

And let’s not forget civil defendants enjoy no presumption of innocence.

1 Like
836

So who is willing to bet that Kari Lake will end up governor before end of 2023?

I am willing to bet she will not bez

Name your stake.

837

:rofl:

“Innocence” isn’t really at play in a civil suit.

The party bringing the suit holds the burden of production.

2 Likes
838

Tell that to the cumulatively thousands of especially “conservative” defendants the Dems have targeted in filing civil suits against in the past. Especially the volume of their cases that ultimately go absolutely nowhere. Yet many of those same innocent patriots often get stuck picking up the tab in racking up humongous personal legal bills to defend themselves. Here the defendants Lake has filed civil action against get we the people paying the freight.

839

Have a good day

840

Ms. Lake will be back.

LET’S GO HOBBS

LET’S GO BRANDON

1 Like
841

Duh, there is not another election in 2022 or 2023.

duh (1)

842

No I am talking about other posters who seem to think there is precedent for Kari Lake to replace Hobbs.

843

Well, DUH.

1 Like
844

That will not happen till the next election cycle. Or, maybe Hobbs will do a good job.

LIBS elected the One Horse Dog Face Pony Soldier, Joey “dim-bulb” Biden. HOW IS THAT WORKING OUT?

845

Pretty well, think you. Dems have passed a whole bunch of legislation that has benefited the public.
Which is funny to see how your side ignores all of it.

1 Like
846

@Nemesis - by ‘well duh’ I meant “Of course you were correct that Kari Lake will not be Gov in 2023”. I know you know when elections happen.

847

Pretty good thanks.

Weird how you feel the need to type that all out each time you mention Biden.