Listen very closely to the recordings. I’ll put money down it’s Bannon and Rudy trying to disguise their voices.

1 Like

Choosing what allegations are thoroughly vetted or not is where there often exists a double standard.

Sorry, don’t care.

#eyeontheball

9 Likes

Ok. The WSJ is a very reputable, small c conservative publication who’s reputation for solid reporting on it’s regular pages is excellent. They couldn’t establish any of these allegations as being factual.

That is offset by the OpEd pages, which have long famously been a swamp that will run just about anything, like 64 different opinion articles calling for an investigation of Hillary Clinton’s murder of Vince Foster, after 3 different investigative bodies had ruled it a suicide.

I know what the game is, Trump supporters don’t want to acknowledge that so much damaging info about Trump is factual and pretend it’s made up smears, so they feel justified in making up actual smears and get indignant when media outlets refuse to touch them. Which isn’t exactly true, publications like The NY Times and WaPo have been perfectly happy to run with Republican crafted hot jobs, but they’re usually crafted much, much more artfully.

Fortunately Tucker isn’t encumbered by anything like standards.

3 Likes

:rofl:

Exactly. It is tabloid garbage. Live version of the National Enquirer. Even Fox admits this truth.

1 Like

I wonder if Carlson is paying this guy enough to pay off his lawsuit he lost…

This is not a matter of could or should of, this is newsworthy plain and simple.

The bigger story is how We the people will ultimately react to seeing how BIG TECH censors most anything they feel hurts their candidate(s) of choice.

Also, no one from the Biden campaign or family is even bothering to deny foul play either. If the laptop did not get obtained with the apparent signature on the computer repair shop bill being Hunter’s and his emails/pictures on it are in fact anything but authentic then your argument of establishing the factual nature by investigative reporters like those at the WSJ will likely be a lot more compelling.

The WSJ did report on it. They reported they couldn’t substantiate any of the allegations being made.

1 Like

The censorship of right wing voices. It burns!

:rofl:

https://twitter.com/facebookstop10/status/1320739830184112129?s=21

2 Likes

How many of those are hits from RT?

1 Like

Weak and lame. WSJ much like 60 Minutes is discrediting themselves further here. If they prance around under the premise of being the best investigative journalists in the land, then certainly digging into certain of Hunter’s emails and pics already verified as authentic by others is children play.

The “others” that have “verified” the “info” are the weak and lame ones. They don’t have credibility to lose. Here’s how it all went down.

Also of interest is why a WH lawyer is so deeply involved in a clumsy smear attempt but the investigations will get it that in a few years.

This was a great read.

It’ll make an awesome made for TV movie, too.

The piece itself could almost be used directly as the screenplay.

Too bad this title is already taken.

image

3 Likes

Nothing has been verified as evidence

Ditto here.

The Wall Street Journal is not conservative on the news side. This is using fake news to ignoring real news.

As Glenn Greenwald has pointed out, no one on the Biden team has claimed that the laptop emails are fake and the mainstream media have attempted to create a “cone of silence” around the story. Realize that these are the same people who spent four years hyperventilating over every rumor and piece of misinformation from anonymous sources as the next bombshell that would remove Trump.

Tony Bobulinski is a credible independent source. Democracy depends on informed voters making decisions; we can rely on the fake-news media to make the decisions for us.

“The Gang That Couldn’t Think Straight”

Still don’t care.

#eyeontheball