No. Did you read it?
Same rhetoric that got Kirk killed.
Newsom is a chooch.
1 Like
No it isn’t.
Rhetoric doesn’t kill people, people kill people. Haven’t you guys been saying that for years?!
1 Like
and the next POTUS.
Allan
That was actually very funny but open mic night at the comedy club is on Thursdays.
1 Like
Miller is a problem.
Are you trying to get people to harm Stephen Miller?
I would heart that, but I’m scared.
3 Likes
No.
…
A basic problem with the lone gunman narrative is that a shot from Robinson’s hunting rifle should have gone straight through Kirk’s body, but there is no evidence of an exit wound that would be consistent with a shot from the front.
Another question is why Kirk’s shirt moves violently in the frames before a wound appears on Kirk’s neck. A possible explanation is that the bullet was deflected by body armor, but there is no evidence that Kirk was wearing body armor. In fact, Kirk’s wife said that he was not wearing body armor in a recent NY Times interview.
If there is no body armor, then it is very difficult to explain the lack of an exit wound, and the observed violent motion of Kirk’s shirt with a single shot from Robinson’s rifle. That could imply that there is another weapon involved.
Here is one of several theories:
I really hope he is your nominee…I really really would love to see that. In fact I dare you libs to select him.
2 Likes
vance v newsom will be a. barn burner for sure.
maybe. AoC for veep.
Allan
Barn burner? Do it.
Newsom is your best choice.
No, Shapiro, Moore or Beshear.
That’s a very interesting and plausible (compared to the last one you posted) theory. But it ignores the important fact that a bullet was fired from the rifle (with the spent brass left in the chamber) at precisely the same moment as this alleged completely unforeseen and unpredictable battery explosion took place and that the bullet was found in his body. The odds of those two things happening simultaneously are astronomical to say the least.
A better theory is that the bullet hit the battery. Was there any evidence from the coroner of an injury (such as a bruise) caused by such an event?
1 Like
Not quoting post because well…it is an insult to anyone’s intelligence.
The expended round was found just under the skin in the back of his neck after it hit his spine. No funny business going on.
But you do you boo boo.
1 Like
Just to play Devil’s Advocate…the only source we have to say they found a bullet in Charlie’s neck is Andrew Kolvet, Charlie Kirk’s business partner.
The medical personnel who examined him have made no public statements of their own.
And Kolvet revealed this as part of his attempts to make Charlie a mythical being (“he was a ‘Man of Steel’ and even in death, he was saving lives!”)
