698

Yes she is and she has a lot of similarly minded peers and social media instigators to prop her up.

:nauseated_face:

699

You missed how some were re-enforced and others were not.

Rubes from red states wouldn’t know this.

The infiltrators would.

700

I did not

You missed how some of them took selfies with the rioters and others did not

Your fantasies about what really happened are about all they are

Same reason why Tucker hasn’t released all the tapes! What’s stopping him? The fbi?

701

Could be. Maybe a director or VP of operations kicks up the salary scale better. Perhaps special project coordinator or agent emeritus.

Titles are just marketing ■■■■■■■■■

:poop:

702

Tucker got taken off of FOX for showing the tapes.

Half empty or

Half full??

1 Like
703

The name you are looking for is Dominic Pezolla.

704

Tucker Carlson got taken off of FoxNews because he cost them hundreds of millions of dollars and will likely cost them more.

705

Why do you often introduce “fantasy” language?

It is odd and misplaced IMO.

There remains no reason that all the footage isn’t released.

I have no idea where the roadblock is.

706

:joy:

No he didnt. He got taken off be because he can’t control his thumbs. :joy: my gosh.

707

It’s neither odd nor misplaced. There is a handful of you that live in a weird fantasy world. It’s not a lot nor is it all of you. But those who do go full rainbows

1 Like
708

That’s the story.

I ain’t buying what you’re selling.

Schumer warned them and Tucker was off the air. THAT I am thinking is the better reason.

1 Like
709

In YOUR fantasy world.

It is all opinion.

Yours is rather forced and farcical IMO.

710

Schumer has control over… checks notes… Fox News.

Okay then

711

Just sharing my POV.

You can ignore the Schumer talk of six ways to Sunday of the FBI getting revenge. I won’t.

2 Likes
712

When opinion is based in ludicrous assertions then it’s just fantasy.

Saying that opinions that unicorns exist are equivalent to those who believe that they do not is lazy.

Or in this case fantastical.

1 Like
713

Why just this one? Ray Epps was an instigator…agreed? Raskin defended him…agreed? Why would a Congressman of the opposing party…do that? Does that make sense?
Why has Epps never been indicted? There’s a lot more here that’s not being revealed and it’s obviously not your way to ask questions?

3 Likes
714

What is the basis of fact that Schumer has any control over FoxNews?

Tucker Carlson cost the organization 3/4s of a billion dollars. There is still another lawsuit pending from Smartmatic that will cost them even more money because of his actions.

If an employee cost an organization over Billion dollars in defamation… why would they retain him?

But no… it makes so much more sense that Schumer is in control.

715

You got your wish… happy now?

716

He was an instigator yes. Sure one of many.

See here is the thing the guy who fed you Ray Epps and the fbi angle is specifically on record in his own texts saying that what he is airing is bull crap and all because he did not want to lose the viewership.

That you ignore that because it’s been now picked up by all your favorite blogs is on you.

717

No. That’s simply a coverup because they were caught red handed and spotlighted by Tucker Carlson.
How many years out are we now? Give me a break! Just look at the article and they’re saying it without admitting it. Now…let’s see if he spends 22 years in jail? He was there where as mr. proud boy wasn’t so certainly he’ll get at least that…dontcha think?

1 Like