BREAKING: lindsey graham: obama Knew About the Counterintelligence Investigation Into the trump Campaign

Nemesis · 2019-10-02T13:56:13.458Z

WildRose:

She clearly and intentionally broke the law, she belongs in jail.

No, there are currently investigations underway by both the IG and DOJ so no it certainly isn’t over.

In your opinion she clearly and intentionally broke the law.

I guarantee that Clinton will not see any jail time and the investigations will ultimately go no where.

Want to place a bet?

Guilds · 2019-10-02T13:57:28.380Z

Smyrna:

I am praising this judge for his judgement. It agrees with mine and what I’ve said in this forum for years.

It looks like what you think will happen, is actually the opposite of will happen.
McCabe is/was not the problem. Barr is the problem.

This mythical deep state, is as valid as trickle down economics.

Once the drips stop dripping…and the truth is exposed, it will be interesting to see if you , and so many others, will realize it’s all been a big con.

Then again, close to 30% of Nixon supporters believed he was innocent, after he resigned.

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T14:00:59.022Z

Guilds:

It looks like what you think will happen, is actually the opposite of will happen.
McCabe is/was not the problem. Barr is the problem.

This mythical deep state, is as valid as trickle down economics.

Once the drips stop dripping…and the truth is exposed, it will be interesting to see if you , and so many others, will realize it’s all been a big con.

Then again, close to 30% of Nixon supporters believed he was innocent, after he resigned.

Yeah…I know. BTW…why did IG Horrowitz suggest criminal charges?

Guilds · 2019-10-02T14:46:54.237Z

Smyrna:

Yeah…I know. BTW…why did IG Horrowitz suggest criminal charges?

BTW…why did Barr’s justice department decide not to prosecute?

Is Barr part of the deep state now?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T14:51:31.434Z

WuWei:

yeah, that’s the point.

The point of multiple investigations was to find out she did nothing wrong? OK

sikofit · 2019-10-02T14:54:48.323Z

party-free:

You were praising a judge potentially coming out against Trump and his admin. You realize that, right?

party-free · 2019-10-02T14:58:22.725Z

Smyrna:

I am praising this judge for his judgement. It agrees with mine and what I’ve said in this forum for years.

The judge’s judgement is that the government is dragging its feet in deciding whether to charge McCabe? The judge’s judgement is that he will release the documents related to McCabe’s firing against the wishes of the Trump administration. You’ve been saying those things? Citation to those posts please?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T15:14:25.205Z

party-free:

The judge’s judgement is that the government is dragging its feet in deciding whether to charge McCabe? The judge’s judgement is that he will release the documents related to McCabe’s firing against the wishes of the Trump administration. You’ve been saying those things? Citation to those posts please?

Yeah. That’s the opposite of what he’s been saying.

WuWei · 2019-10-02T15:20:04.734Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

yeah, that’s the point.

The point of multiple investigations was to find out she did nothing wrong? OK

Oh but she did.

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T15:25:47.871Z

Guilds:

BTW…why did Barr’s justice department decide not to prosecute?

Is Barr part of the deep state now?

Bam…we have a conundrum.

Guilds · 2019-10-02T15:35:10.736Z

Smyrna:

Bam…we have a conundrum

You do realize, this whole deep state myth goes back as far…well probably since the inception of the USA.

Most recently, Nixon said the same thing that Trump and Co. are saying.

The only there, there, is most likely by those that claim there is a deep state.
It was certainly the case with Nixon.

And most likely will be the case with Trump.

True believers however, will use that, and claim that confirms the deep state exists.

A circular blind faith belief, soaked in paranoia.

party-free · 2019-10-02T15:53:43.137Z

Yep.

When you© see a conspiracy in EVERYTHING, you© start arguing both for and against things you© claim to support.

I think that’s what happened here. The judge said (paraphrased) “if you don’t charge McCabe by November 15th, I’m releasing the information via FOIA regarding his firing” because (direct quote) " …I think our society, our public does have a right to know what’s going on."

And the reason appears to be, as the article states, a “mad effort to find some way to indict Mr. McCabe to appease the president.” If McCabe’s crimes were so flagrant, there would have been charges filed already. So this judge said charge him, or we’ll show EVERYONE the evidence that is the basis for all this. And I don’t believe that would be favorable to Trump.

party-free · 2019-10-02T15:56:23.386Z

Smyrna:

Bam…we have a conundrum.

Bam, we have a dodge.

sikofit · 2019-10-02T15:59:57.648Z

party-free:

Bam, we have a dodge.

It’s hard to stay on track when you’re being carried away by a river of drips

Guilds · 2019-10-02T16:07:08.476Z

sikofit:

It’s hard to stay on track when you’re being carried away by a river of drips

acsirip · 2019-10-02T16:31:43.973Z

@sikofit you are killing it in this thread, please stop or Trump will get mad at you

conan · 2019-10-02T16:44:09.868Z

By Comey, Strzok and McCabe and company?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T16:49:41.037Z

conan:

By Comey, Strzok and McCabe and company?

Did you sleep though 2013-2015 or something?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T16:53:08.498Z

conan:

By Comey,

Yeah Comey was totally in Hillary’s corner. That’s why he improperly discussed her being under investigation a week before the election.

Cratic3947 · 2019-10-02T17:05:45.508Z

I’m glad they are going to have hearings. It’s the reason the dems have gone full ■■■■■■■ these last few weeks with the Ukraine nothing burger.

It’s also smart to do it during an election year.