BREAKING: lindsey graham: obama Knew About the Counterintelligence Investigation Into the trump Campaign

party-free · 2019-10-02T12:00:31.543Z

You just tried to praise this judge for doing the OPPOSITE of what you want to happen.

Releasing the information is what McCabe wants. The judge is telling the government either make your case or stop wasting our time. Him releasing the info mentioned only helps McCabe.

You get that? It would not be the drips you want.

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T12:28:55.891Z

party-free:

You just tried to praise this judge for doing the OPPOSITE of what you want to happen.

Releasing the information is what McCabe wants. The judge is telling ththe government either make your case or stop wasting our time. Him releasing the info mentioned only helps McCabe.

You get that? It would not be the drips you want.

Oh…so suddenly you’re informed?

party-free · 2019-10-02T13:10:13.461Z

Smyrna:

Oh…so suddenly you’re informed?

I get why you’d deflect to me. It’s what Dear Leader does, too. When he can’t refute what someone says, and completely contradicts himself, he starts pointing fingers and blaming.

So again, you understand that the judge releasing the information in November would be detrimental to your “drip drip drip” nonsense, right? Trump and the government do NOT want that information to be released. McCabe, and his defense, want that information released.

The judge is telling the prosecutors AGAINST McCabe to ■■■■ or get off the pot-because they’re wasting the court’s time if they’re not going to bring charges against McCabe. That’s literally what that story shows. And the judge said “if you’re not going to press charges, then we’re going to release related documents.” And that would be detrimental to Trump.

So again, you get that right? So when you said:

Smyrna:

This judge recognizes the drip, drip, drip…I’ve been observing for years and says…get it on already.

You were praising a judge potentially coming out against Trump and his admin. You realize that, right?

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T13:19:33.512Z

party-free:

You were praising a judge potentially coming out against Trump and his admin. You realize that, right?

I am praising this judge for his judgement. It agrees with mine and what I’ve said in this forum for years.

Nemesis · 2019-10-02T13:56:13.458Z

WildRose:

She clearly and intentionally broke the law, she belongs in jail.

No, there are currently investigations underway by both the IG and DOJ so no it certainly isn’t over.

In your opinion she clearly and intentionally broke the law.

I guarantee that Clinton will not see any jail time and the investigations will ultimately go no where.

Want to place a bet?

Guilds · 2019-10-02T13:57:28.380Z

Smyrna:

I am praising this judge for his judgement. It agrees with mine and what I’ve said in this forum for years.

It looks like what you think will happen, is actually the opposite of will happen.
McCabe is/was not the problem. Barr is the problem.

This mythical deep state, is as valid as trickle down economics.

Once the drips stop dripping…and the truth is exposed, it will be interesting to see if you , and so many others, will realize it’s all been a big con.

Then again, close to 30% of Nixon supporters believed he was innocent, after he resigned.

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T14:00:59.022Z

Guilds:

It looks like what you think will happen, is actually the opposite of will happen.
McCabe is/was not the problem. Barr is the problem.

This mythical deep state, is as valid as trickle down economics.

Once the drips stop dripping…and the truth is exposed, it will be interesting to see if you , and so many others, will realize it’s all been a big con.

Then again, close to 30% of Nixon supporters believed he was innocent, after he resigned.

Yeah…I know. BTW…why did IG Horrowitz suggest criminal charges?

Guilds · 2019-10-02T14:46:54.237Z

Smyrna:

Yeah…I know. BTW…why did IG Horrowitz suggest criminal charges?

BTW…why did Barr’s justice department decide not to prosecute?

Is Barr part of the deep state now?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T14:51:31.434Z

WuWei:

yeah, that’s the point.

The point of multiple investigations was to find out she did nothing wrong? OK

sikofit · 2019-10-02T14:54:48.323Z

party-free:

You were praising a judge potentially coming out against Trump and his admin. You realize that, right?

party-free · 2019-10-02T14:58:22.725Z

Smyrna:

I am praising this judge for his judgement. It agrees with mine and what I’ve said in this forum for years.

The judge’s judgement is that the government is dragging its feet in deciding whether to charge McCabe? The judge’s judgement is that he will release the documents related to McCabe’s firing against the wishes of the Trump administration. You’ve been saying those things? Citation to those posts please?

sikofit · 2019-10-02T15:14:25.205Z

party-free:

The judge’s judgement is that the government is dragging its feet in deciding whether to charge McCabe? The judge’s judgement is that he will release the documents related to McCabe’s firing against the wishes of the Trump administration. You’ve been saying those things? Citation to those posts please?

Yeah. That’s the opposite of what he’s been saying.

WuWei · 2019-10-02T15:20:04.734Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

yeah, that’s the point.

The point of multiple investigations was to find out she did nothing wrong? OK

Oh but she did.

Smyrna · 2019-10-02T15:25:47.871Z

Guilds:

BTW…why did Barr’s justice department decide not to prosecute?

Is Barr part of the deep state now?

Bam…we have a conundrum.

Guilds · 2019-10-02T15:35:10.736Z

Smyrna:

Bam…we have a conundrum

You do realize, this whole deep state myth goes back as far…well probably since the inception of the USA.

Most recently, Nixon said the same thing that Trump and Co. are saying.

The only there, there, is most likely by those that claim there is a deep state.
It was certainly the case with Nixon.

And most likely will be the case with Trump.

True believers however, will use that, and claim that confirms the deep state exists.

A circular blind faith belief, soaked in paranoia.

party-free · 2019-10-02T15:53:43.137Z

Yep.

I think that’s what happened here. The judge said (paraphrased) “if you don’t charge McCabe by November 15th, I’m releasing the information via FOIA regarding his firing” because (direct quote) " …I think our society, our public does have a right to know what’s going on."

And the reason appears to be, as the article states, a “mad effort to find some way to indict Mr. McCabe to appease the president.” If McCabe’s crimes were so flagrant, there would have been charges filed already. So this judge said charge him, or we’ll show EVERYONE the evidence that is the basis for all this. And I don’t believe that would be favorable to Trump.

party-free · 2019-10-02T15:56:23.386Z

Smyrna:

Bam…we have a conundrum.

Bam, we have a dodge.

sikofit · 2019-10-02T15:59:57.648Z

party-free:

Bam, we have a dodge.

It’s hard to stay on track when you’re being carried away by a river of drips

Guilds · 2019-10-02T16:07:08.476Z

sikofit:

It’s hard to stay on track when you’re being carried away by a river of drips

acsirip · 2019-10-02T16:31:43.973Z

@sikofit you are killing it in this thread, please stop or Trump will get mad at you