Another very, very bad day for Paulie.
He keeps racking 'em up.
Another very, very bad day for Paulie.
He keeps racking 'em up.
Dysfunction? denial…? There’s no collusion…
adroit: Cratic3947:Senate Intel committee say no collusion… Bipartisan result.
Please stop asserting this falsehood. Democrats on the committee did not say no collision.
They were interviewed by an NBC reporter who says differently…
■■■■■■■■■ he explicitly said the Democrats disagree with “no collusion.”
Cratic3947: Orygun: Cratic3947:So, you admit Manaforts prosecution has nothing to do with Trump…
Mmmmm- no. No I don’t.
Then it’s fine to point out the senate intel has reported on a bipartisan basis there was no collusion…
They did not report that on a bipartisan basis. They reported on a bipartisan basis that there was “no direct evidence.” They did not say there was no collusion.
There was no direct evidence that Scott Peterson killed his wife, which explains why he has never spent a night in jail or prison.
so you don’t care about evidence
Cratic3947: adroit: Cratic3947:Senate Intel committee say no collusion… Bipartisan result.
Please stop asserting this falsehood. Democrats on the committee did not say no collision.
They were interviewed by an NBC reporter who says differently…
■■■■■■■■■ he explicitly said the Democrats disagree with “no collusion.”
Truth has no meaning for some people.
Mueller has all of the receipts.
Biggest news of the day…Mueller has the goods and he can prove it
Buh bye Paulie
"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Biggest news of the day…Mueller has the goods and he can prove it
This one is ■■■■■■■ huge.
So he’s gonna spend the rest of his life in prison.
DOLOOP: Cratic3947: Orygun: Cratic3947:So, you admit Manaforts prosecution has nothing to do with Trump…
Mmmmm- no. No I don’t.
Then it’s fine to point out the senate intel has reported on a bipartisan basis there was no collusion…
They did not report that on a bipartisan basis. They reported on a bipartisan basis that there was “no direct evidence.” They did not say there was no collusion.
There was no direct evidence that Scott Peterson killed his wife, which explains why he has never spent a night in jail or prison.
so you don’t care about evidence
Man, the desperation is palpable. The urgent, cloying, clawing need to deflect, and to do it with false statements.
Your friend Paulie Manafort has had his plea deal voided, by a federal judge, because he likes lying.
He’s the guy who met with Kilimnik, gave Kilimnik valuable polling data weeks after the RNC convention, and Kilimnik is a representative of Deripaska.
"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Senate Intel committee say no collusion… Bipartisan result.
Actually, they said no hard evidence Trump colluded. Very different than your implication.
Cratic3947:Senate Intel committee say no collusion… Bipartisan result.
Actually, they said no hard evidence Trump colluded. Very different than your implication.
"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
No direct evidence. That does not mean “no collusion.” There is, indeed, mountains of indirect evidence.
See now what I meant about re-reading for comprehension? You quoted the very content that put the falsehood to your statement.
Cratic3947:"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
No direct evidence. That does not mean “no collusion.” There is, indeed, mountains of indirect evidence.
See now what I meant about re-reading for comprehension? You quoted the very content that put the falsehood to your statement.
Sure, it does… What the heck is indirect evidence?..
"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Spam it in this thread 14 more times.
Senate Intel Committee made those finding WITHOUT talking to Manafort and others that have been indicted. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce their finding might be different if they actually did some real investigating. It’s a good thing the adults are in charge now.
Cratic3947:"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Spam it in this thread 14 more times.
They don’t seem to be reading the original post, so
I get the weird feeling a thread derailment is occurring.