Breaking: Judge voids Paul Manafort plea deal

Another very, very bad day for Paulie.

He keeps racking 'em up.

Dysfunction? denial…? There’s no collusion…

■■■■■■■■■ he explicitly said the Democrats disagree with “no collusion.”

so you don’t care about evidence

Truth has no meaning for some people.

Mueller has all of the receipts.

Biggest news of the day…Mueller has the goods and he can prove it

Buh bye Paulie

1 Like

"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/12/nbc_dilanian_senate_probe_finds_no_evidence_of_russian_collusion_in_trump_campaign.html

This one is ■■■■■■■ huge.

image

1 Like

So he’s gonna spend the rest of his life in prison.

Man, the desperation is palpable. The urgent, cloying, clawing need to deflect, and to do it with false statements.

Your friend Paulie Manafort has had his plea deal voided, by a federal judge, because he likes lying.

He’s the guy who met with Kilimnik, gave Kilimnik valuable polling data weeks after the RNC convention, and Kilimnik is a representative of Deripaska.

1 Like

"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Actually, they said no hard evidence Trump colluded. Very different than your implication.

"NBC News’ intelligence and national security reporter Ken Dilanian reports that the Senate Intelligence Committee has come to a bipartisan conclusion that there is no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

No direct evidence. That does not mean “no collusion.” There is, indeed, mountains of indirect evidence.

See now what I meant about re-reading for comprehension? You quoted the very content that put the falsehood to your statement.

Sure, it does… What the heck is indirect evidence?..

Spam it in this thread 14 more times.

2 Likes

Senate Intel Committee made those finding WITHOUT talking to Manafort and others that have been indicted. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce their finding might be different if they actually did some real investigating. It’s a good thing the adults are in charge now.

3 Likes

They don’t seem to be reading the original post, so

I get the weird feeling a thread derailment is occurring.

2 Likes