He did say that. He said " we arent very fond of releasing terrorists"
How about stop paying for him to be imprisoned?
Can you link to the charges made that he was a terrorist? Or the court record of the trial?
That’s not quite what he said, but that’s neither her nor there.
The problem with this of course is there is no confirmation he was a terrorist AND it doesn’t matter.
As part of the Trump Administration trying to show it was “willing to facilitate Garcia’s return”, they said they’d get a plane ready should El Salvador chose to release him.
So Bukele had no blockers from the US as he tried to allege he did. His hands were not tied.
This is what you can learn when you learn to look past the scripted theatre.
Yes, he could. But why would he?
MISTAKE
That is the administration’s position. They are currently in power, so that’s all that matters. When DEMS come back into power, they can attempt to bring them all back to the US. It should be quite a spectacle.
We don’t know the financial arrangement, so we are in no position to speculate.
Point out the mistakes.
Not a chance will I play your game.
it was stated in open court that gargia was deported in error by the govt.
Allan
So, once again you deflect and avoid substantiating your opinions by quoting from the Alien Enemies Act or the CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES when the Act was being created.
Aside from that, I’m still waiting for you to provide the wording “due process” from any Section found in the Alien Enemies Act.
Yes that is true, but courts can’t compel El Salvador to return its own citizen back to the US. SCOTUS also said District Judges can’t make decisions on things outside their districts, something Boasberg continues to ignore. What does he not understand that there are 677 other judges just like him that have districts just like him, he is usurping their authority with what he’s doing. You can’t be in DC and rule on what should happen in Florida. That’s not his jurisdiction. Boasberg is not a judge he’s a liberal advocate.
2 Likes
The bigger problem I have is SCOTUS made it abundantly clear that Fed District Judges have no jurisdiction outside their chosen district, yet they ignore the 5-4 ruling. Boasberg is literally usurping the power of 677 other Federal District Judges with his actions. The cases he is trying to rule on aren’t from his district.
2 Likes
Boasberg is certainly engaging in a specific type of tyranny as described by Madison:
”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [Judge Boasberg] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47
2 Likes
It’s been quoted dozens of times.
And the SCOTUS agrees.
Boasberg history is enough to call him an activist instead of a judge. He doesn’t care these cases are outside his jurisdiction, he thinks he is the 10th Supreme Court justice. Districts mean nothing to him. Dude is holding the DOJ in contempt in regards to cases outside his district, dudes exactly who Madison warned us about. The DOJ has a legal obligation to not comply with Boasberg. If they complied with Boasberg they would be infringing on the rights of 677 other Federal District Judges.
You just made that up.
Nowhere in this entire thread has anyone quoted from the Alien Enemies Act the wording “due process”.
Why do you find it necessary to make up ■■■■ to defend your opinions?
SCOTUS used the word “Facilitate” which is basically saying try to work with El Salvador to get him back if you can. El Salvador said they aren’t doing it, so that case is dead too. US courts have no authority on how other countries should try their criminals. Just like a Federal District Court in DC can’t tell a Federal District Court in Texas how to rule. Wait liberals are trying that as we speak. Then when the DOJ doesn’t comply with an unconstitutional ruling that district judge holds the DOJ in contempt 
