BREAKING: Appeals court upholds Boasberg’s deportation block, ignores intent of Alien Enemies Act

[peek-a-boo]

@biggestal99

convicted felon.

Allan

And impeached twice.

I guess the DEM lawfare plan kind of backfired.

[Oldandtired]

You better watch out. You may end up like the one on here who bragged about Kamela winning. Remember old we vote we win who is still hiding under her bed.
From what I see if the democrats don’t rein in their crazies and get their act together there is a good chance they lose in 2026 and 2028.

[Oldandtired]

President of the United States.

[biggestal99]

@peek-a-boo

Mandate:
the authority to carry out a policy or course of action, regarded as given by the electorate to a candidate or party that is victorious in an election.

less than a majority of votes gives trump the authority.

i say no.

Allan

[biggestal99]

@peek-a-boo

I guess the DEM lawfare plan kind of backfired.

nope.

lawfare was not the reason trump won, it is very clear to me.

Allan

[peek-a-boo]

@biggestal99

less than a majority of votes gives trump the authority.

i say no.

Allan

And why would I, or anyone else, care what you think? Trump is the President, and he does have the authority. What you or I think is kind of irrelevant.

[peek-a-boo]

@biggestal99

nope.

lawfare was not the reason trump won, it is very clear to me.

Allan

We are both welcome to our opinions.

[WuWei]

What a stupid post.

Trump did get the majority of votes. Who got more?

[Samson_Corwell]

@johnwk2

Unfortunately, Judge Karen Henderson, in her written opinion to shut down some of Trump’s deportations, confused the legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act.

Judge Henderson went to extraordinary lengths in her written opinion to selectively quote from the Congressional Debates covering the creation of the Alien Enemies Act, and focused on statements in opposition to the Act while ignoring responses given to those statements in opposition, and she also focused on sources other than the actual debates, supposedly to ferret out and arrive at the legislative intent of the Act and evil to be addressed.

Having pointed the above out, on May, 16th, 1798, we find the following in the Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1725:

ALIENS.

"Mr. Sewall said, the Committee for the Protection of Commerce and Defence of the Country, to whom it was referred to inquire into what measures would be proper to be taken respecting aliens, were of opinion their instructions did not go to a sufficient extent, and directed him to propose to the House the following resolution for adoption:

“ Resolved, That the committee on that part of the President’s Speech which relates to commerce and the defence of the country, be authorized to consider the danger which may result by means of aliens and other disaffected or seditious persons residing within the United States, and what measures ought to be taken for securing, removing, or otherwise restricting such persons, and to report by bill or otherwise.” ___ LINK

And later, on May, 22nd, Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1791, we find:

“Mr. O. believed, therefore, that it would be best to vest a discretionally power in the Executive to secure and take care that these men should do no injury. And this could not be looked upon as a dangerous or exorbitant power, since the President would have the power, the moment war was declared, to apprehend the whole of these people as enemies, and make them prisoners of war. And in case of a predatory incursion, made on this country, there might be as much reason for securing some of them as in case of actual war or invasion.”___ LINK

So, ferreting out and arriving at the legislative intent and evil to be addressed by the Alien Enemies Act, is not as complicate as Judge Henderson presented, which was obviously done by her to complicate and confuse the question.

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including deportation power, to deal with aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

.

My eyes right now as I read this:

[Samson_Corwell]

@biggestal99

@peek-a-boo

Mandate:
the authority to carry out a policy or course of action, regarded as given by the electorate to a candidate or party that is victorious in an election.

less than a majority of votes gives trump the authority.

i say no.

Allan

The plurality/majority is the winner. Stop being sloppy.

[johnwk2]

@Samson_Corwell

@johnwk2

Unfortunately, Judge Karen Henderson, in her written opinion to shut down some of Trump’s deportations, confused the legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act.

Judge Henderson went to extraordinary lengths in her written opinion to selectively quote from the Congressional Debates covering the creation of the Alien Enemies Act, and focused on statements in opposition to the Act while ignoring responses given to those statements in opposition, and she also focused on sources other than the actual debates, supposedly to ferret out and arrive at the legislative intent of the Act and evil to be addressed.

Having pointed the above out, on May, 16th, 1798, we find the following in the Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1725:

ALIENS.

"Mr. Sewall said, the Committee for the Protection of Commerce and Defence of the Country, to whom it was referred to inquire into what measures would be proper to be taken respecting aliens, were of opinion their instructions did not go to a sufficient extent, and directed him to propose to the House the following resolution for adoption:

“ Resolved, That the committee on that part of the President’s Speech which relates to commerce and the defence of the country, be authorized to consider the danger which may result by means of aliens and other disaffected or seditious persons residing within the United States, and what measures ought to be taken for securing, removing, or otherwise restricting such persons, and to report by bill or otherwise.” ___ LINK

And later, on May, 22nd, Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1791, we find:

“Mr. O. believed, therefore, that it would be best to vest a discretionally power in the Executive to secure and take care that these men should do no injury. And this could not be looked upon as a dangerous or exorbitant power, since the President would have the power, the moment war was declared, to apprehend the whole of these people as enemies, and make them prisoners of war. And in case of a predatory incursion, made on this country, there might be as much reason for securing some of them as in case of actual war or invasion.”___ LINK

So, ferreting out and arriving at the legislative intent and evil to be addressed by the Alien Enemies Act, is not as complicate as Judge Henderson presented, which was obviously done by her to complicate and confuse the question.

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including deportation power, to deal with aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

.

My eyes right now as I read this:

The truth cannot be changed to what it is not.

Those who have actually reviewed the CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES: ALIEN ENEMIES, beginning at page 1785 will certainly find, by a preponderance of evidence, the primary object of An Act Respecting Alien Enemies was to delegate extraordinary powers to the President to deal with aliens on American soil who may threaten the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

Judge Henderson of the United States Court of Appeals, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, omitted the overwhelming evidence contradicting what she quoted from the Congressional debates to arrive at her conclusion found in her WRITTEN OPINION e.g., she intentionally ignored various parts of the debates which documents the primary object of the Act such as:

Mr. Otis defends the bill and discretionary power delegated to the president P. 1790-1791

“Mr. O. believed, that, to provide for this detention of the person, was all Congress could now do. If the bill was recommitted, he did not think any definite provision could be made. It was necessary the President should have the power of judging in this case, and that punishment ought not to depend upon the slow operations of a trial.”

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including unobstructed deportation power, to deal with aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

Judge Henderson is a frickin liar and a disgrace to our judicial system.

JWK

[Guilds]

@Smyrna

I believe that stands for district of corruption

Certainly applies to whom resides in the WH today.

[Guilds]

@Optrader

and given the despicable rulings that SCOTUS has inflicted on the country it is apparent that even they aren’t completely without bias.

Despicible SCOTUS rulings are constitutional. They have the last word.

[Guilds]

@SixFoot

supporting everything anti-American.

Rule of law is anti-American?

[Guilds]

@Optrader

It was written by brilliant men in such a way that it could be plainly understood by non lawyers.

Damn…all those cases that were reversed as time went on clearly proves your point…

[johnwk2]

@Guilds

@Optrader

and given the despicable rulings that SCOTUS has inflicted on the country it is apparent that even they aren’t completely without bias.

Despicible SCOTUS rulings are constitutional. They have the last word.

What makes a Supreme Court opinion legitimate is when it is in harmony with the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.

JWK

Those who reject abiding by the text of our Constitution, and the intentions and beliefs under which it was agree to, as documented from historical records ___ its framing and ratification debates which give context to its text ___ wish to remove the anchor and rudder of our constitutional system so they may then be free to “interpret” the Constitution to mean whatever they wish it to mean.

[Guilds]

@conan

Most of country hates Californians.

You mistake hate for Jealousy. CA has pretty much everything all other 49 have, and more. Y’ll just hate the politics. Some of it bothers me as well.

[Guilds]

@WuWei

Trump won the popular vote

Wrong.

[conan]

@Guilds

You mistake hate for Jealousy. CA has pretty much everything all other 49 have, and more. Y’ll just hate the politics. Some of it bothers me as well.

You have no idea. People from Rustbelt actual despise Californians. They seem em as pompous ■■■■■■■■■■■■ it’s not about jealousy. Or people from ranch country in western states dictating what they can do with open land.

That hatred is real.

[johnwk2]

Wrong post.