Bob Woodward’s Stunning Look into the Presidency

[peek-a-boo]

@Plasmaball

not towards impeachment. But it will affect him in the polls that he lied about paying off stormy. Not with people like you…You were a lost cause after the access hollywood tape. But women,Independents etc will walk away from him.

Dems have a 12 point generic lead. That covers their margins. They now have a 1 and 3 chance of taking the senate. I dont think they will take the senate, but those are trump odds.

Or you going to dismiss their 1 and 3 chance?

Sure, just like they did in 2016.

[dantes]

Does she vote?

[NebraskaFootball]

@peek-a-boo

That’s interesting. Polling shows 85% to 90% approval amongst Republicans. About where it was when he was elected.

Trump’s approval ratings among those remaining as self-identifying Republicans is irrelevant to the point I’m making regarding the contraction within the party. Of course those who remain are loyal and approving of Trump. It’s about those leaving the party because of him.

[peek-a-boo]

@madasheck

He was even on Fox today. Which means peek has no excuse now.

Who was on Fox today? Woodward? I didn’t know that if true. I don’t watch Fox as a general rule.

[NebraskaFootball]

@reflechissez point clearly went sailing over your head here.

[peek-a-boo]

@dantes

Does she vote?

Sometimes. She didn’t vote in 2016.

[DougBH]

It always does.
She appeared to be saying I was lying about the 98% chance given by Huffington.
Whether Hillary literally believed it was obviously my opinion, but all you have to do is look at the posts in this forume (well, you can’t now) to see that Democrats were fully buying that and other such predictions.

[peek-a-boo]

@NebraskaFootball

Trump’s approval ratings among those remaining as self-identifying Republicans is irrelevant to the point I’m making regarding the contraction within the party. Of course those who remain are loyal and approving of Trump. It’s about those leaving the party because of him.

If you honestly believe a conservative third party candidate will gain any traction in 2020, you are living in a dream world.

You will have 2 viable choices in 2020, just as you did in 2016. It is shaping up to be Trump against a DEM candidate. If you waste your vote by not voting for Trump, you will essentially be pulling the lever for the DEM candidate.

[Demon]

Can you get her to watch All the President’s Men? Not the book, but it would at least give her an idea of who Woodward is. Plus, she’ll get to watch Redford.

[NebraskaFootball]

@peek-a-boo

You do what you always do. You arrogantly hoist yourself up onto your high horse and proclaim your opinion as fact. Your opinion is just that. No more or less valid than mine is. You might think otherwise, but that too is just your opinion.

Negative. I provide facts and evidence and links to “support” my opinion. You just spout an opinion. That does not make them equal, no matter what you fallaciously claim in your personal attacks against me.

Now, if you also supported your opinions with facts and evidence and links, then you’d have a point. But that’s not typically how you roll. You just declare things are a certain way, regardless of the facts and evidence to the contrary.

[peek-a-boo]

@Demon

Can you get her to watch All the President’s Men? Not the book, but it would at least give her an idea of who Woodward is. Plus, she’ll get to watch Redford.

Why? She is happy and so am I. I have no urge to change who she is.

[Demon]

Knowing who Woodward is would change who she is?

[peek-a-boo]

@NebraskaFootball

Negative. I provide facts and evidence and links to “support” my opinion. You just spout an opinion. That does not make them equal, no matter what you fallaciously claim in your personal attacks against me.

Now, if you also supported your opinions with facts and evidence and links, then you’d have a point. But that’s not typically how you roll. You just declare things are a certain way, regardless of the facts and evidence to the contrary

You left out the part where I stated that I was done with this conversation.

[peek-a-boo]

@Demon

Knowing who Woodward is would change who she is?

What would be the point? She would have no more interest in sitting through such a movie than I would have of sitting through one of her horror flicks.

[reflechissez]

@DougBH

@reflechissez

@DougBH

They believed it when HuffPo told them that there was a 98% chance of their winning. Why would they do anything different? Just go out and collect even more money from the Hollywood elite for next time.

There is a drawback to being surrounded by an adoring elite.
You tend to believe them when they tell you how great you are.

I think I know why you keep repeating this lie. You believe that everyone acts like right wingers in terms of sourcing their news.

Someone has been telling you a lie about what Huffington Post was predicting, and you are repeating it.

“The HuffPost presidential forecast gives Democratic presidential nominee [Hillary Clinton] a 98 percent chance of winning the general election on Tuesday. That means we’re pretty darn certain that ― barring some major catastrophe, scandal or nearly every single poll being wrong ― Clinton will be elected.”
A High Probability Of Hillary Clinton Winning Doesn’t Mean It Will Be A Blowout | HuffPost Latest News

You’re welcome. Glad I could clear it up for you and the idiots who gave your fake post 2 likes.

I think you’re confused again, son. You have asserted that all liberals read and believed Huffpo. Not true. I’m a regular reader and it appears you know more about what they post than I do.

[dantes]

Then her interest (or lack of it) is irrelevant.

[Demon]

It’s a very good movie. Her loss, I guess.

[reflechissez]

@peek-a-boo

@NebraskaFootball

Why do I provide logic and facts and links to support my point? Because that is standard practice in a debate. The real question is why you don’t?

You do what you always do. You arrogantly hoist yourself up onto your high horse and proclaim your opinion as fact. Your opinion is just that. No more or less valid than mine is. You might think otherwise, but that too is just your opinion.

I believe we might be done now.

Good lord. Here we go again with BooBoo’s inferiority complex.

[C_Actor]

@DougBH

It always does.
She appeared to be saying I was lying about the 98% chance given by Huffington.
Whether Hillary literally believed it was obviously my opinion, but all you have to do is look at the posts in this forume (well, you can’t now) to see that Democrats were fully buying that and other such predictions.

You left out the part where most cons here were more skeptical of Trump winning than any lib I recall.

[DOLOOP]

@peek-a-boo

@NebraskaFootball

Unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal conspiracy to illegally affect the outcomes of the 2016 election in his favor. Welcome to reality.

It doesn’t mean Trump is guilty of anything. He isn’t a criminal as you keep parroting.

Sure. He hasn’t been convicted of anything.

He’s an unindicted co-conspirator who was named by another conspirator in the guilty plea. Accepted by a judge.