What justice system is available to those with the experience of living in a locality with qualified immunity laws?

1 Like

I don’t listen to criminals and terrorist. They want change than work within the system to make changes. They want to loot and burn lock them up with the rest of the criminals.

All of this individualism is very nice. I agree about self sufficiency and choices but again your are judging these people experience. You don’t get to tell them how to act. If someone who is not a business owner doesn’t get to tell you how to feel or act or react why do you feel you can do so when it comes to telling them what to do?

What’s the difference between you and them.

Here you are telling me a Native American what things are like. And low and behold your telling me how to act and what it’s really like.

And just so you know @Oldandtired and i am sure you give a flying you know what but based on your board posts i respect the ■■■■ out of your work ethic, etc.

You are really an inspiration to some people In your life based on your posts which is beatiful

Makes you no less or no more able to judge what other people do. Of course you and of course you should but then don’t tell others they don’t know their ass from their elbow when it comes to their experience.

Yes. Thank you for understanding my point!!! That’s exactly what i was trying to do.

It doesn’t feel good when others try to pretend what you experienced and how you have experienced. Now try applying that metric to those communities. And listen

Or a white person telling a black person to get over slavery?

I get to tell them how to act on my property. :wink:

1 Like

I don’t disagree, but the rules vary. Duty to flee is the law here.

Who cares about their experiences.

The law does and I support the law.

See above.

I’ll say this…any one on the left that is silent on destruction of those small business aren’t business owners.

1 Like

What authoritarian about wanting to protect your business?

1 Like

You do not know me, what I have dealt with. I have made many gambles in my life…and so far, I have been able to meet the challenge.

And I now remember why I will go back to ignoring your posts.

Ciao!

I really do wish regular beatings from the largest inmate on those destroyers caught & issued lengthy sentences.

Having known guys who worked the prison system & an E R that serviced it, I won’t say what besides beatings takes place there. But I wouldn’t put it past those repeat offenders to make the lives of the newly imprisoned rioters something they seriously think about ending themselves.

Am tired of these destructive little ■■■■■■ Mama didn’t give them a good kick in the ass, it’s time for someone else to get that job :smiling_imp:

1 Like

That’s not what i am referencing C

Who catches the beating g for state violence

Terrorist do that with the aide of the MSM being silent.

We’re having a good discussion on legalities in the other thread.

New Hampshire is a stand your ground state unless something has changed the internet is unaware of.

No, always duty to flee. No castle doctrine, either. Even in your own home, duty to flee.

I know, I was brought up on some pretty serious charges thirty or so years ago, and what kept me out of prison for the rest of my life was defense of a third party and my egress was blocked by the assailant. If either of those conditions hadn’t been met, I would have been convicted, and on the most serious charge, wouldn’t yet be eligible for parole.

Link

On the other hand, New Hampshire’s “stand your ground” law allows the use of deadly force without trying to retreat anywhere a person has a legal right to be. That includes streets, shops or parking lots.

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/RSA/html/LXII/627/627-4.htm

III. A person is not justified in using deadly force on another to defend himself or herself or a third person from deadly force by the other if he or she knows that he or she and the third person can, with complete safety:
(a) Retreat from the encounter, except that he or she is not required to retreat if he or she is within his or her dwelling, its curtilage, or anywhere he or she has a right to be, and was not the initial aggressor;