DMK
22
You mean the ones that havenāt moved out of the city? 
3 Likes
oh you definitely are!
iām so sorry. itās torture i know
1 Like
Guvnah
26
Damn, does it hurt to stretch that far?
You know that I know you are making this up. A smart man would stop digging the hole.
Guvnah
27
It was a fabrication in response to my post. You canāt change that.

Guvnah:
Damn, does it hurt to stretch that far?
You know that I know you are making this up. A smart man would stop digging the hole.
stretch for sure
theyāll stretch it nanometer thin if they have to, to cling to an annoyingly obviously stupid narrative
Guvnah
29
Of course it is to be believed. Like I said:
No. Thatās good.
Does that excuse someone from planning a rally and performing actions to put attendees at risk?

Guvnah:
Damn, does it hurt to stretch that far?
You know that I know you are making this up. A smart man would stop digging the hole.
Feel free to expand on your post to enlighten me. I await clarification.
My apologies that I assumed you were talking about New York BLM.
Hmm, perhaps the point eluded you?
Hawk92
34
But why do they continue to vote for such stupidity? do they think they would get free things? the crime is surging quite high this week. doesnāt New York want to have tourists again? when the virus crisis is over at some point?
DMK
35
They go of their own free will and understand the risks thereof.
However, telling one group they cannot while allowing another group to be exempt is not right at all.
Folks want equality, right? Or do they? 
2 Likes
So the organizer of the rally bears no responsibility to the safety of the attendees?
The rally did not require masks. They encouraged close seating and packing them in, eschewing social distancing. The organizers bear no responsibility?
However, telling one group they cannot while allowing another group to be exempt is not right at all.
Folks want equality, right? Or do they? 
Agreed. Although there are some differences. The BLM protests certainly had more masks than Trumpās rally. They were also outside which is less likely to spread the virus. They also were not stationary which also impedes the chance of transmission.
Iām not saying they were wise protests, but they were safer than the rally imo.
DMK
37

Borgia_dude:
So the organizer of the rally bears no responsibility to the safety of the attendees?
The rally did not require masks. They encouraged close seating and packing them in, eschewing social distancing. The organizers bear no responsibility?
Do you really need someone to take responsibility for your actions? Someone to blame other than yourself?
I have no issues with folks making decisions for themselves as well as paying the consequences for them.

Borgia_dude:
Agreed. Although there are some differences. The BLM protests certainly had more masks than Trumpās rally. They were also outside which is less likely to spread the virus. They also were not stationary which also impedes the chance of transmission.
Iām not saying they were wise protests, but they were safer than the rally imo.
We can parse, but it really isnāt about that. It is about one group being given an exemption.
What if white supremacists were given an exemption?
All people should be treated equally under the law. Period.
1 Like
Hawk92
38
In Canadaās largest city if you are a white you cant host protest rallies or you would deemed a racist according to its mayor that supports the BLM.
Masks are basically useless if you dont practice physical distancing.

Hawk92:
In Canadaās largest city if you are a white you cant host protest rallies or you would deemed a racist according to its mayor that supports the BLM.
Masks are basically useless if you dont practice physical distancing.
There was a bunch of White Qnon protesting in Ottawa last weekend.
DMK
40
Funny thing, I was in the grocery store and out of respect wore a mask.
A guy 5 feet away from me had this hideous cologne on and it about made me gag.
I could smell it through my mask.
So, really what is the point of a mask if I can smell someoneās cologne five feet away from me?