when you run out of ways (or give up attempts) to defend smollett/media do you just blurt out “goalposts” now?
john wayne, or “trump crazies” (who ever that is) are not pertinent to smollett’s crimes and sickness. nor are they to the uncredible disgraceful press.
It must be hard these days to find actual racism. If a prominent liberal actor resorts to making it up. The media then follows along with no question. As long as it paints MAGA hat trump supporters as the bad people, then the story can be told over abd over until believed to be true.
The only fact that was known initially is that Smollett said the attack happened.
Almost every medium reported that the attack did happen rather than allegedly happened.
If it was just the first part everyone could say good on you, but then when you read the second part from “at the same time” is her lamenting it wasn’t true, but if you look at the stat’s it was possible . . .
Judging by any number of fake hate crimes in recent years that got attention only to disappear down the nothing to see here hole I would suggest a few basic rules (some or all of which others may have suggested), it’s probably fake if:
A noose is somehow involved
It happened on a progressive college campus
The one who noticed is in any way a SJW
Doubly so if they’re in race/ethnicity/etc studies
She wasn’t supporting Smullet. She was speaking out against hate crimes – which are a problem for which I think there’s no disagreement. There’s no problem in what she posted.