Bipartisan SENATE report details Trump campaign contacts with Russia in 2016

[tnt]

@NebraskaFootball

When this corrupt cabal of traitors are finally out of office, I hope their criminal endeavors are fully investigated and that justice is both harsh and swift for them.

The GOP is officially dead as a party. This is what they have now become. Traitors and sycophants. Criminally complicit. America has a stark choice. Vote them all out and work to rebuild from the ashes, or allow this level of corruption to become even more pervasive and watch this grand experiment of ours finally unravel.

Wow - that’s a big deal.

[tnt]

@WuWei

"We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,” Rubio said.

Uh huh.

Is that what the report says? Or is that what Little Marco says?

[NebraskaFootball]

@tnt

@NebraskaFootball

When this corrupt cabal of traitors are finally out of office, I hope their criminal endeavors are fully investigated and that justice is both harsh and swift for them.

The GOP is officially dead as a party. This is what they have now become. Traitors and sycophants. Criminally complicit. America has a stark choice. Vote them all out and work to rebuild from the ashes, or allow this level of corruption to become even more pervasive and watch this grand experiment of ours finally unravel.

Wow - that’s a big deal.

Indeed. And Bill Barr likely squashed it. Eventually the nation will know everything. Just like we do now with Vietnam, Watergate, and 9/11. And the Trump version of the GOP will own every last bit of it.

[LucyLou]

@Smyrna

This is what “bipartisan” looks like…

The GOP lead this investigation.

[gooddad409]

@coolidge

Yeah I’m not sure what exactly is pushing the lib russia narrative. Is it because trumps out there reminding people the democrats spied on his campaign? Or is it because the fbi official pleading guilty of falsifying a document in the trump probe?

Desperation? Run out of ideas?

[DougBH]

@Jezcoe

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

The Steele dossier was unknown during the election and was only used in the case of Carter Page.

Where else was it used?

It was used as the way to attack the administration publicly for over two years, one year in which the DNC sat silently while the source of the dossier was not publicly known.
Answer this…how did CNN know when the dossier had been placed before Trump and was therefore a “legitimate” topic to write about?

[GrandWazoo]

@Munimula1

I hate to say it, but I’m beginning to suspect Mueller, too. We know he stopped short- was that by design?

I don’t think so. I think he limited himself. However I said from the get-go, follow the money. And I was sort of shocked that he didn’t look that way at all.

[Jezcoe]

@DougBH

@Jezcoe

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

The Steele dossier was unknown during the election and was only used in the case of Carter Page.

Where else was it used?

It was used as the way to attack the administration publicly for over two years, one year in which the DNC sat silently while the source of the dossier was not publicly known.
Answer this…how did CNN know when the dossier had been placed before Trump and was therefore a “legitimate” topic to write about?

So changing the parameters of it’s use from legal to political.

Cool.

The Existence of the dossier was not known to the public before the election.

It was only used in a legal sense for a Legit FISA warrant against Carter Page… which we all found out about after the election.

I argue that it’s existence actually helps the the President more than it hurts because it is just another grievance that can be lied about and exploited for political gain.

[Jezcoe]

@GrandWazoo

@Munimula1

I hate to say it, but I’m beginning to suspect Mueller, too. We know he stopped short- was that by design?

I don’t think so. I think he limited himself. However I said from the get-go, follow the money. And I was sort of shocked that he didn’t look that way at all.

Remember there were a dozen other investigations spun off from Mueller’s.

We know what four of them are if I am remembering correctly.

I have a feeling that just like the criminal referrals, these investigations got the can from Barr.

[conan]

I’m still waiting on that proof.

We have actual proof that FBI, CIA colluded with one another to spy and bring Trump down.

Where are emails or text messages?

[tnt]

@conan

I’m still waiting on that proof.

We have actual proof that FBI, CIA colluded with one another to spy and bring Trump down.

Where are emails or text messages?

Actually a few GOP led committee investigations have concluded teh CIA and the FBI acted properly and without bias and that the FISA warrants were properly granted.

Re: texts…how about the text exchange between Cohan the russian agent who said he repressed some damaging video of teh president to help him get elected.

[TommyLucchese]

Golly even the Senate investigation talks about how the guy Manafort was handing off proprietary Trump campaign internal polls to was a Russian intelligence officer.

[tnt]

I can’t find mention of this report on Foxnews.com

Maybe it’s there and I missed it.

[conan]

Well those emails and text messages proves this post

@tnt

Actually a few GOP led committee investigations have concluded teh CIA and the FBI acted properly and without bias and that the FISA warrants were properly granted.

lack any candor.

[tnt]

@conan

Well those emails and text messages proves this post

@tnt

Actually a few GOP led committee investigations have concluded teh CIA and the FBI acted properly and without bias and that the FISA warrants were properly granted.

lack any candor.

???..which emails and texts prove that GOP led investigations didn’t determine just what I said ?

[kingarthur65]

@conan

A fact? Do they have email exchange? Text exchange? If so post it.

@Apocalypto

Trump told Mueller in written answers that he recalled no conversations with Stone about Wikileaks.
He lied.

SSCI: “The Committee assesses that Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions.”

The Senate Intelligence Committee, The Mueller Report, The Judge in the Stone case and the US Attorney in the Stone case all came to the same conclusion about Trump’s claim the he did not recall talking to or about Stone’s contacts with Wikileaks.
I think the US Attorney in the Manfort case would agree, as well as the judge. Same as those involved in the Gates case.

[conan]

Then prove it…

[conan]

I assess the libs are hardcore Marxist.

[Guilds]

@conan

Then prove it…

Nothing presented will convince you. Nothing.

[kingarthur65]

There is enough proof for the above mentioned Judges and US Attorneys, but not enough for you.

I’ll tell you what, Feel free to read the court documents, special counsel report and Senate report and prove all of them and me wrong. If you don’t have the time and energy to read the documents… then by all means, you can continue to regurgitate the fake and false news that that is fed to you. if you are looking for the ability to make an educated argument. I suggest reading the source documents.

United States v. STONE, 1:19-cr-00018 - CourtListener.com

United States v. MANAFORT, 1:17-cr-00201 - CourtListener.com

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

report_volume5.pdf