Bill Maher Shocked to Find Most Pro-Life Advocates Are Women

[RTchoke]

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

You do understand the Governor and Lt. Governor hate each other? You do understand the courts put that on hold, right?

And that matters how?

There is a person in power who is pushing for it. And she isn’t alone.

Because nothing she wants to do gets through because the Gov does not let it happen. Hell, he even cut her office budget to practically nothing so she couldn’t do ■■■■ nor have many staff at all.

It matters.

[RTchoke]

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

. That has gone by the wayside, to anywhere, anytime and any stage of development.

That is a myth.

You aren’t listening to your side.

I am.

Name the Democrats.

So now it has to be a public figure? Not “your side” as was being discussed? Just listen to the pro-abortion crowd. The rest of us do.

Nice goal post move.

Elected figures please.

That is what I would like to see.

Nah. Not gonna play your goal post moving game.

The rabid left have dropped the legal, safe and rare argument and went all in.

[Jezcoe]

@RTchoke

Because nothing she wants to do gets through because the Gov does not let it happen. Hell, he even cut her office budget to practically nothing so she couldn’t do ■■■■ nor have many staff at all.

It matters.

There is an elected GOP politician that is calling for the normal exclusions to go away and the response is… well… she doesn’t matter… you have unnamed people on “your” side just as crazy.

Quite a wild response.

[zantax]

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

You do understand the Governor and Lt. Governor hate each other? You do understand the courts put that on hold, right?

And that matters how?

There is a person in power who is pushing for it. And she isn’t alone.

Because nothing she wants to do gets through because the Gov does not let it happen. Hell, he even cut her office budget to practically nothing so she couldn’t do ■■■■ nor have many staff at all.

It matters.

It’s ridiculous, our worst extremists err on the side of protecting the unborn, their extremists want unrestricted abortion up until the moment of birth. No wonder they don’t want people to vote on it. Because they obviously lose.

[Jezcoe]

@RTchoke

Nah. Not gonna play your goal post moving game.

The rabid left have dropped the legal, safe and rare argument and went all in.

I still don’t think you guys know what “moving the goal posts” mean.

I started this out by saying that eliminating the exception for rape was being put on the table. I have provided an elected person who is currently holding office who is advocating for that end.

The response to that has been wand having nonsense.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

, their extremists want unrestricted abortion up until the moment of birth

Name them. Which elected Democrats are going for that?

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

Nah. Not gonna play your goal post moving game.

The rabid left have dropped the legal, safe and rare argument and went all in.

I still don’t think you guys know what “moving the goal posts” mean.

I started this out by saying that eliminating the exception for rape was being put on the table. I have provided an elected person who is currently holding office who is advocating for that end.

The response to that has been wand having nonsense.

Pfft,@“”sorts of nonsense gets proposed, doesn’t mean much if it’s not headed for law.

[TexasCNC]

Once again, I do not agree with your conclusion. Most fertilized eggs never make it to week 4, implantation. By week 6, it has a heartbeat which is where most people draw the line if they’re pro-life. To me, up to week 4 or prior to implantation, there’s little difference between the natural cycle of flushing fertilized eggs out of your system and increasing the chances that the flushing process takes place, preventing pregnancy. If you take the morning after pill, the goal is to delay ovulation to prevent fertilization. It’s a backup method but from condoms to birth control pills to other methods, there’s honestly no excuse for an abortion these days.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@zantax

draconian law will stand for long

Why not? If you cant elect a majority of D’s in, say, Alabama, how is the law going to get struck down?

@zantax

If Alabama enacts a super restrictive law, it will be a pariah and the voters will reject the pols who took them there.

We can hope, but I don’t see that happening in Conservative states.

@zantax

The more rational outcome looks more like 15 weeks

And yet many of the trigger laws enact near total bans. Your example, Alabama bans all abortions except for health reasons. No exception for rape and incest, and certainly not 15 weeks

@zantax

You guys have a fully realized boogeyman but nobody outside your cult is moving.

Doesn’t this sentence pretty much negate your previous attempted gas lighting? On one hand you say “rational outcome” but on the other hand claim no one agrees with me.

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

, their extremists want unrestricted abortion up until the moment of birth

Name them. Which elected Democrats are going for that?

Are you kidding, it’s in the democratic platform. Why, what do you think the gestational limit is in Democratic party policy?

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

Nah. Not gonna play your goal post moving game.

The rabid left have dropped the legal, safe and rare argument and went all in.

I still don’t think you guys know what “moving the goal posts” mean.

I started this out by saying that eliminating the exception for rape was being put on the table. I have provided an elected person who is currently holding office who is advocating for that end.

The response to that has been wand having nonsense.

Pfft,@“”sorts of nonsense gets proposed, doesn’t mean much if it’s not headed for law.

Up until recently Roe was fine. Now all sorts of nonsense is on the table. Tennessee was putting forth a bill where the family of the rapist could sue if the victim got an abortion.

They are not thinking these things through.

[zantax]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

draconian law will stand for long

Why not? If you cant elect a majority of D’s in, say, Alabama, how is the law going to get struck down?

@zantax

If Alabama enacts a super restrictive law, it will be a pariah and the voters will reject the pols who took them there.

We can hope, but I don’t see that happening in Conservative states.

@zantax

The more rational outcome looks more like 15 weeks

And yet many of the trigger laws enact near total bans. Your example, Alabama bans all abortions except for health reasons. No exception for rape and incest, and certainly not 15 weeks

@zantax

You guys have a fully realized boogeyman but nobody outside your cult is moving.

Doesn’t this sentence pretty much negate your previous attempted gas lighting? On one hand you say “rational outcome” but on the other hand claim no one agrees with me.

See how it plays out, any republican majority in a state that thinks it can get way with a total ban with no exceptions or do away with birth control is going to end up being a blue pro choice state.

No idea why pro choice people are so upset, if you have public opinion on your side it’s much easier to move a state than the fed.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@TexasCNC

Once again, I do not agree with your conclusion

That’s fine, but folks who believe that life begins at conception think that you are wrong

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

, their extremists want unrestricted abortion up until the moment of birth

Name them. Which elected Democrats are going for that?

Are you kidding, it’s in the democratic platform. Why, what do you think the gestational limit is in Democratic party policy?

There isn’t one.

There is one reference to preserving Roe v Wade and four times abortion is mentioned and it all has to do with access.

There is no reference in the platform that abortion on demand be a thing up until birth.

[JayJay]

No it means the laws on the books will be “triggered” (I.e. put into effect) based on the verdict the court reaches.

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

, their extremists want unrestricted abortion up until the moment of birth

Name them. Which elected Democrats are going for that?

Are you kidding, it’s in the democratic platform. Why, what do you think the gestational limit is in Democratic party policy?

There isn’t one.

There is one reference to preserving Roe v Wade and four times abortion is mentioned and it all has to do with access.

There is no reference in the platform that abortion on demand be a thing up until birth.

But there is no upper limit, I enjoy your tap dancing though.

[RTchoke]

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

Because nothing she wants to do gets through because the Gov does not let it happen. Hell, he even cut her office budget to practically nothing so she couldn’t do ■■■■ nor have many staff at all.

It matters.

There is an elected GOP politician that is calling for the normal exclusions to go away and the response is… well… she doesn’t matter… you have unnamed people on “your” side just as crazy.

Quite a wild response.

Considering I know many of these politicians, talked with them within the last month, and know where they actually stand and what is being discussed in the legislature and what isn’t as well as what stands a chance in hell of even being introduced…yeah, I’ll go with what I KNOW, not what you are fantasizing about.

[zantax]

Democrats lost the script, which was safe, legal and rare and went to tik tok nuts praising abortion as a sacrament to satan and lost the public, so sad.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@zantax

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

draconian law will stand for long

Why not? If you cant elect a majority of D’s in, say, Alabama, how is the law going to get struck down?

@zantax

If Alabama enacts a super restrictive law, it will be a pariah and the voters will reject the pols who took them there.

We can hope, but I don’t see that happening in Conservative states.

@zantax

The more rational outcome looks more like 15 weeks

And yet many of the trigger laws enact near total bans. Your example, Alabama bans all abortions except for health reasons. No exception for rape and incest, and certainly not 15 weeks

@zantax

You guys have a fully realized boogeyman but nobody outside your cult is moving.

Doesn’t this sentence pretty much negate your previous attempted gas lighting? On one hand you say “rational outcome” but on the other hand claim no one agrees with me.

See how it plays out, any republican majority in a state that thinks it can get way with a total ban with no exceptions or do away with birth control is going to end up being a blue pro choice state.

No idea why pro choice people are so upset, if you have public opinion on your side it’s much easier to move a state than the fed.

Well, your mouth to God’s ears. The 13 trigger states are deeply conservative, so this is unlikely to happen.

[zantax]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

draconian law will stand for long

Why not? If you cant elect a majority of D’s in, say, Alabama, how is the law going to get struck down?

@zantax

If Alabama enacts a super restrictive law, it will be a pariah and the voters will reject the pols who took them there.

We can hope, but I don’t see that happening in Conservative states.

@zantax

The more rational outcome looks more like 15 weeks

And yet many of the trigger laws enact near total bans. Your example, Alabama bans all abortions except for health reasons. No exception for rape and incest, and certainly not 15 weeks

@zantax

You guys have a fully realized boogeyman but nobody outside your cult is moving.

Doesn’t this sentence pretty much negate your previous attempted gas lighting? On one hand you say “rational outcome” but on the other hand claim no one agrees with me.

See how it plays out, any republican majority in a state that thinks it can get way with a total ban with no exceptions or do away with birth control is going to end up being a blue pro choice state.

No idea why pro choice people are so upset, if you have public opinion on your side it’s much easier to move a state than the fed.

Well, your mouth to God’s ears. The 13 trigger states are deeply conservative, so this is unlikely to happen.

Initial overreach by bad actors corrected by voting, democracy. Pro choice should welcome this decision really, much easier to move a states voters on abortion than the court.