I read portions of the paper and it was quite interesting. As you say, possible in the future but a lot of challenges to overcome. Not sure how successful energy harvesting would be in the human body,for example.
Application specific, not reconfigurable, not programmable.
1 Like
He has given away fifty billion in spare change.
Agreed on the near monopoly.
And theyâre still trying.
Welcome back, fellow caveman.
1 Like
Next time, click on the link then copy it from your address bar instead of selecting âcopy link addressâ.
Searched " nano-particles activated by induced fields" - found this
All vaccines cause side effects as do all medications.
Some of those side effects are barely noticeable, in a small percentage of cases they can be significant and in a very tiny percentage the can cause a life threatening emergency or even death.
It is different, you have to get the scanner within inches of the skin to even detect them.
I use AVID chips on all my animals from cattle to horses, to dogs and cats and they are many thousands of times larger than the smallest particles that can enter the blood stream and my scanner has to get within six inches of the chip to read it.
Thatâs nice. Anything in there about these nanoparticles transmitting data or âinduced currentâ or are we at the fling links at board and hope something sticks phase of the debate?
Feel free to actually excerpt quotes from your link with what you think supports your position.
Programmable Nano Machines are probably no more than a decade, maybe two from being reality.
They will be the greatest innovation in medical technology since the stethoscope and X Ray imaging when they arrive and are fully developed and exploited.
There are reasonable precautions that can be taken to avoid a poorer outcome from COVID 19. Better nutrition and avoiding conditions that increase inflammationâlike obesityâcanât hurt.
But why not have a vaccine too? Why not pursue both natural medicine in conjunction with and nof instead of vaccines?
Good for Bill Gates. I wish him success in development of one.
And I am ok with letting anyone take it who trusts it and wants his litigation-waived vaccine. But I wonât be trusting it or taking it willingly. I think I should be free to make that decision, but I suspect Bill will insist that I must take it.
All thatâs required is enough current to activate the nano-particle to interact with itâs environment and create a designed effect that occurs when
a certain substance is present in the body and which can be detected by the external 5G (?) network. It doesnât have to generate a message and send it.
Detected by a 5G network? Sounds really cool and futuristic dude! Totally believable!
Activating current? What source in the body?
It doesnât require a source in the body. In an isolating transformer the secondary coil is inert until a field passes through it from the primary coil. 5G EMR can initiate a sufficient current in a nano-particle to enable it to do itâs designed activity , and that change of state is detectable by the 5G source.
5G can do that? Do you have any real world examples?
All vaccines have litigation protections.
