Article says nothing about nano particles. Where are you getting your info? Please link? If you have a link.
Batman movie?
MaybeâŚ
Based on what? Link your research to this phenomenon. As a person with a psych degree its very interesting.
Try to stay on topic. The OP is not about Q.
Article says nothing about nano particles. Where are you getting your info? Please link? If you have a link.
Just google ânano-particles in vaccinesâ . Itâs been around for a while.
As a person with a psych degree its very interesting.
Which of the many psychological theories and psychology schools out there are your favourites?
Konssurvative1:Article says nothing about nano particles. Where are you getting your info? Please link? If you have a link.
Just google ânano-particles in vaccinesâ . Itâs been around for a while.
Not in this version of the multi verse it hasnât.
As I worked with children and adolescents one of the best and easiest to implement is Glassersâs reality therapy. And now that I work with people with AutismâŚI am partial to applied behavioral analysis.
enki: mollyBrown:This forum is going to get wild if Qanon beliefs are going to be allowed out in the open.
Yes it will. Qs only goal is to spread outrageous disinformation creating confusion and division.
The Bill Gates conspiracies have been circulating for a long time, and Covid was an easy target.
Try to stay on topic. The OP is not about Q.
Please. Peddle the disinformation to a more gullible audience.
Roxiebelle:I donât know about all the nano particles techno side of it but I heard itâs super charged and can be more dangerous then any virus especially for seniors who are the ones who mostly get a flu shot each year.
I never get a flu shot but I have warned friends and family that do get them each year to double check that its not the Gates funded shot next time they get one.
I hear surveys show only 30% of people would willingly take the vaccine.
I would take the very first dose rolling off of the filling line. There is nothing harmful in our med. I would hope when the vaccine becomes available, we would let people decide for themselves what they want to do. Let everyone be responsible for themselves and return to normal life.
There is nothing harmful in our med.
No negative side-effects ever from vaccines?
altair1013:There is nothing harmful in our med.
Non negative side-effects ever from vaccines?
You do know that vaccines are the only reason that we no longer have plagues wiping out 50 million people, right?
I can only speak to this vaccine. I have no problem with it. I know how itâs made. And I also have no problem with anyone who decides they donât want it. America is about freedom. Make it available and let people choose for themselves.
. I know how itâs made. And I also have no problem with anyone who decides they donât want it. America is about freedom. Make it available and let people choose for themselves.
That we can agree on.
Well after screwing the world out of trillions to make Microsoft a monopoly itâs good to see him giving some of the spare change back.
Everything in life is a trade off. We lose a handful of people to medical errors, unexpected bad reactions and ânegative side effectsâ but, the trade off is longer, healthier, more productive lives for billions that would have otherwise been lost.
hwyflier: WuWei:Natural evolution of the thread? Good natured banter?
I donât know what those phrases are supposed to mean. I do know that post two is q anon nuttery.
Iâm all for it staying. My premise has long been that all thatâs left of Republicans is that nutty stuff, the fact that nearly every trumper left here espouses conspiracy theory as their anchor philosophy is something I consider to be a victory.
Itâs just silly to come in and pat heads and try to encourage something different than Q anon discussion when post two is a thing.
Guilt by association fallacy and poisoning the well fallacy. Try to argue logically.
Logic includes nanoparticles capable of communicating location to an outside, distant receiver? Where do they get the power in a nano size particle?
I worked a project directly related to particles sending signals on location. There is no technology existing today that gets anywhere close to nano size. We are still in the milli size and even then the range and battery life is extremely limited.
So yes, your nano particles are conspiracy theory.
I donât believe your pretentions to omniscience.
âŚsays the guy claiming gates is trying to inject us with nanoparticles.
Paul_Thomson: hwyflier: WuWei:Natural evolution of the thread? Good natured banter?
I donât know what those phrases are supposed to mean. I do know that post two is q anon nuttery.
Iâm all for it staying. My premise has long been that all thatâs left of Republicans is that nutty stuff, the fact that nearly every trumper left here espouses conspiracy theory as their anchor philosophy is something I consider to be a victory.
Itâs just silly to come in and pat heads and try to encourage something different than Q anon discussion when post two is a thing.
Guilt by association fallacy and poisoning the well fallacy. Try to argue logically.
Logic includes nanoparticles capable of communicating location to an outside, distant receiver? Where do they get the power in a nano size particle?
I worked a project directly related to particles sending signals on location. There is no technology existing today that gets anywhere close to nano size. We are still in the milli size and even then the range and battery life is extremely limited.
So yes, your nano particles are conspiracy theory.
A conspiracy theory borne out of, as usual, a poor understanding of the scienceâŚin this case, quantum dot dyes.
Everything in life is a trade off. We lose a handful of people to medical errors, unexpected bad reactions and ânegative side effectsâ but, the trade off is longer, healthier, more productive lives for billions that would have otherwise been lost.
Side effects to what? What is in the vaccine that would cause a side affect?