Big debate, who's going to watch and any predictions?

[Nemesis]

But surely their daughters are listneing to Kid Rock and Ted Nugent?

[RTchoke]

Only libs would feel an adult needs to explain adult decisions to a child like that child is in charge of how things are going to go in the household.

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

it looks like trump did pretty well in a 3 on 1 debate

There is zero chance you watched and came away with that conclusion.

[RTchoke]

@matt1618

so you are saying forget sports for girls. Girls train to compete against girls but then get beat by boys. I think that impacts more people than what happened on January 6. More people are impacted by that than what happened on January 6. And all extra gung ho questons on January 6, which very few people care about it except for leftists who beat a dead horse on January 6. Lots of people have girls who’d like to compete fair and square.

There is a reason why they won’t talk about girls being safe in sports even though many people are in support of it:

[LucyLou]

Thank you, Tulsi

[conan]

@TheRedComet

He needs discipline. Bad.

He has none.

[Jezcoe]

@matt1618

All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child”—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant” to instead require medical personnel to “care for the infant who is born alive.” The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including
information about born-alive infants.

They changed wording to preserve the life of born alive infant. Not preserving life is killing. Now not even required to report it. The article also shows that prior to the law being changed multiple babies that survived abortions were treated and survived.

‘In the first three and a half years of this additional reporting—prior to Walz taking office—the state recorded 16 abortion procedures that led to live births: five in the second half of 2015 after the legislation went into effect; five in 2016; three in 2017; and three in 2018.’

He specifically removed language that led to live births before he came into office

The Government forcing doctors and parents to keep a dying child alive beyond reason is not in anyone’s interest.

Banning palliative care isn’t helping anyone.

[Jezcoe]

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

Did she do that for everyone or just a select few that she agreed with? Does that little virtue only apply to some or all?

Harris actually never contributed to the bail fund… she simply tweeted about it.

Like Harris, you don’t answer the question asked.

I feel that I have.

Lets say two people are accused of pretty much the same crime.

Both are offered cash bail.

One is able to pay the bail and walk free… the other isn’t and is jailed before trial.

Now remember the guilt of either party has not been established through due process by the State.

Explain to me why it is fair for the Government to hold someone in detention because they lack the resources to pay while those who can walk free before trial.

Harris went to bat for only a certain subset of accused for a certain crime. Why is it fair only THOSE people get the benefit of the VP asking people to h elp them and others in the same position don’t get that benefit?

Face it, she went out of her way for certain people only because of her virtue signalling and her disagreement with their initial arrest.

Don’t talk fair when it’s obvious that was not the intention.

She sent out a tweet saying “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.”

That’s it.

I also notice that an answer to my question hasn’t been given. It’s okay.

[Impenitent]

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/11/harris-campaign-trump-second-presidential-debate-call

if she won, why do it again?

[Publius]

@Impenitent

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/11/harris-campaign-trump-second-presidential-debate-call

if she won, why do it again?

Because it was fun.

[Publius]

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

Did she do that for everyone or just a select few that she agreed with? Does that little virtue only apply to some or all?

Harris actually never contributed to the bail fund… she simply tweeted about it.

Like Harris, you don’t answer the question asked.

I feel that I have.

Lets say two people are accused of pretty much the same crime.

Both are offered cash bail.

One is able to pay the bail and walk free… the other isn’t and is jailed before trial.

Now remember the guilt of either party has not been established through due process by the State.

Explain to me why it is fair for the Government to hold someone in detention because they lack the resources to pay while those who can walk free before trial.

Harris went to bat for only a certain subset of accused for a certain crime. Why is it fair only THOSE people get the benefit of the VP asking people to h elp them and others in the same position don’t get that benefit?

Face it, she went out of her way for certain people only because of her virtue signalling and her disagreement with their initial arrest.

Don’t talk fair when it’s obvious that was not the intention.

Sounds kinda like you know who and the J6ers.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@coolidge

kamala really doesnt have a policy to run on. So i am kind of left at the same feeling.

I about threw up when she went on about the bs of her restoring the hope and dream of America or some ■■■■■■■■ like that. For today’s lib the new American dream is receiving a welfare check from the government.

[Camp]

Trump did great. His turnabout on I’m Speaking…was the highlight.

No way Harris spins that as a win.

[Jezcoe]

@Camp

Trump did great. His turnabout on I’m Speaking…was the highlight.

No way Harris spins that as a win.

The dude got triggered by crowd size like he is the Winter Soldier and a code word can send him into super Moron mode.

Harris showed just how easy it is to manipulate Trump because he has no emotional control.

[tnt]

@Camp

Trump did great. His turnabout on I’m Speaking…was the highlight.

No way Harris spins that as a win.

“I saw it on TV!!!”

“We have a concept!”

“No one leaves my rally’s!”

[Camp]

Here it is.

"I’M TALKING NOW:" Donald Trump responds to Vice President Kamala Harris’s flip-flopping record

Harris was bobbing around like a worried hen.

Trump pointed out the policy fakes and lies.

It was awesome. Read the comments.

[thinkingman]

@Camp

Trump did great. His turnabout on I’m Speaking…was the highlight.

No way Harris spins that as a win.

harris thought she was going to score a “gotcha” but she fell short.

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

it looks like trump did pretty well in a 3 on 1 debate

There is zero chance you watched and came away with that conclusion.

hard to accept i understand

pretend not to see it too, like nbc

[Camp]

Trump turned it on her.

It was ■■■■■■■ great!

Even Shapiro was downtrodden in the spin room.

[Camp]

The Cadres have nothing or they would be posting clips.

We have the clips.