469

“The overriding question is whether the noncitizen poses a current threat to public safety,” Mayorkas wrote in a Thursday memo to ICE, according to the Washington Post.

Washington Post

Amazing.

2 Likes
470

Which law?

1 Like
471

Absent a settlement, the government will be forced to defend hundreds of these lawsuits. The flimsy legal positions and actual malice would be exposed in a constant barrage of court hearings. Previously sealed court docs would become public.
If the Congress members prefer that, I’d support their decision to try these cases and then defend that position when the malicious actions are presented to a sympathetic jury.

2 Likes
472

What is the US Code statute number that was violated?

473

Click “read more”

474

And if one of those gets a really massive payment… that sets the standard for the 1000 more that are behind it.

But it is much much easier to complain about Biden giving illegals money without the understanding as to why this is happening.

1 Like
475

Which law?

2 Likes
476

A jury would not be sympathetic when they find out over 2000 foreign families were intentionally trying to game our system with the help of the ACLU shyster lawyer crowd.

JWK

477

How many times has the Constitution been called the law of the land?

Ms. L. asserted violations of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the federal asylum statute at 8 U.S.C. § 1158 which provides that all non-citizens with a well-founded fear of persecution shall have the opportunity to seek asylum, and APA violations for arbitrary and capricious ICE practices and failure by ICE to consider paroling detained asylum seekers as per its own parole directive.

When the officers separated them, the plaintiff could hear her daughter in the next room frantically screaming that she wanted to remain with her mother. No one explained to the plaintiff why they were taking her daughter away from her or where her daughter was going or even when she would next see her daughter. The plaintiff claimed that by forcibly taking a 7-year-old child from her mother, without justification or even a hearing, the defendants were in violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.

On March 2, 2018, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a motion to expedite resolution of said motion. The plaintiff asked the court to enjoin the defendants from continuing to separate her from her daughter and argued that expedition was necessary to remedy the devastating harms that this separation was inflicting with each passing day. In support of this argument, the plaintiff offered testimony from nine medical experts who asserted that the trauma of forced separation from a parent imposes severe and long-lasting psychological and emotional damage on young children, especially children who are incarcerated and have already suffered the trauma of fleeing their home country.

478

CLICK HERE for an actual summary of the case which no one here has yet to summarize.

479

Mayorkas like nearly all of the J’Biden cabinet appointees is an inept unqualified buffoon that has caused irreparable damage to the department he was put in charge of.
Putting a lying clown like Mayorkas in charge of the DHS is akin to giving whiskey and car keys to teenagers!

2 Likes
480

It’s the exact same information linked to in your diatribe from the exact same source.

481

I’m all for it. Remind the voters exactly who and precisely what is running for office again.

482

I’m not interested in going down another one of your rabbit holes to confirm your previous “nuh uh”. Sorry.

1 Like
483

Please site the specific law.

2 Likes
484

Due process for one.

There is also the fact that we have the emails from the administration showing that they knew that this was causing harm to children and they expanded the program.

Heck… some of the children didn’t recognize their parents when they were reunited.

That is some bad bad ■■■■ that happened.

485

The fraudulent asylum seekers and the ACLU are colluding in a misapplication of our asylum law.

And the Biden Administration is all in on this $BILLION payout settlement money laundering operation under which American citizens get left holding an empty bag.

JWK

486

You can complain about the ACLU all you want… but the Trump adminstration lost in court and they stopped the policy.

With what we know about internal documents and emails about how the policy was implemented it would not go well in court.

This is why they are settling.

Would you rather they fight this… lose and pay out more?

487

Baloney. The complainant did not have the appropriate documentation for seeking asylum, and she was properly placed in federal detention.

Stop making crap up!

JWK

488

It’s why the the government lost the case.