Let me ask my question one last time.
What in the freaken OP are you “disagreeing” with? Please quote that part.
JWK
It’s great how you manage to add to the discussion. With explanations of your opinions and why you may disagree with someone.
2 Likes
The criteria for asylum
Glad you like it, but this thread isn’t about me.
What’s the math of legal vs illegal?
Exactly! Rules are meaningless under the Biden Administration. They are simply ignored or gotten rid of with illegitimate Executive Orders.
Now, with respect to asylum, the swarm of Central America’s poverty stricken migrants into our country do not qualify as asylum-seekers.
See: New MPP data shows 4,000 asylum-seekers allowed into U.S. under Biden administration
Apr 22, 2021
”McALLEN, Texas (Border Report) — Since President Joe Biden took office, nearly 4,000 asylum-seekers who had been forced to remain in Mexico have had their cases been transferred to U.S. immigration courts and have been allowed to cross into the United States, according to newly released data.”
But having a “general fear of dangerous situations in your home country is not grounds for obtaining asylum”. LINK
Now, listen to why they come:
.
.
The poverty stricken teenaged women are a Trojan horse which our socialist Democrat Party Leadership is counting on to create “anchor babies”. Thousands of teenaged poverty stricken women will give birth to tens of thousands more, and then into millions of financially dependent voters which suck the life blood of American citizens like a swarm of ticks and fleas, and our socialist Democrat Party Leadership not only encourages them to come, but finances, with tax dollars, the medical expense of them giving birth on American soil to create an anchor baby which opens the door for even more taxpayer financed “benefits”
.
And in the process, American Citizens not only lose their country and their children pay the price, but American citizens are turned into tax slaves to pay for the economic needs of the Democrat Party’s voting base being imported from poverty stricken Central America.
see: Illegal Immigrant Births - At Your Expense
"It was 5 a.m. and CBS News national correspondent Byron Pitts is with a woman who is nine months pregnant. She’s rushed to a south Texas hospital to undergo a C-section - a $4,700 medical procedure that won’t cost her a dime. She qualifies for emergency Medicaid."
It is more apparent as each day passes that the United States is being defeated from within, and without a shot being fired!
JWK
There is no better way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled and criminal populations of other countries.
.
Illegal - Legal = 49
Let’s keep the undesirables out at all costs.
Undesirables such as Albert Einstein.
They are of such low class.
Of course we have the radical Ronald Reagan who uttered these words.
“We shall continue America’s tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.”
He was a commie. We all that.
Allan
If we can’t believe in st. Ronnies words who are we to believe.
Allan
Since when do liberals believe anything President Reagan said?
1 Like
St Ronnie was good on immigration.
Allan
Different circumstances.
The United States is passing through a crisis, mostly of its own making.
How about we get some long standing issues fixed before we start inviting all the third worlders to rush in?
1 Like
These are refugees.
Even Donald trump accepted refugees.
Allan
Economic refugees =/= refugees of warfare.
If they are fleeing a warzone, that’s the fine. Poverty isn’t a valid reason, especially if they are passing other nations to go straight into the west.
Whose criteria?
Your position on ascribing characteristics to these refugees and their inability to succeed in this country.
Oh and also i disagree that they should not be brought based on some auspicious position that we have enough people here.
85% of refugees wind up in (typically neighboring) developing countries, such as Uganda and Ethiopia, which alone combine to accept 500,000 refugees annually).
The vast majority of those Uganda refugees are coming from war torn South Sudan and DRC.
(I’m sharing this because most people aren’t aware of this and mostly think of refugees as coming to developed nations, not countries with per capita incomes of <$700/year)
I have an issue with solely economic refugees but there is a persecuted refugee they can fall under economic refugees to some extent and that i think is missing from the point of comparison
Your government’s criteria.
How?
…
