Biden releases 'gender equity' plan that calls for eliminating cash bail

[DMK]

@Jezcoe

Not the same thing.

But there is a separate mistake you made.

Can you please stop with the wall of replies?

[Guvnah]

@PurpnGold

@Guvnah

(It will also contain an exception for the life of the mother, though that should go without saying since our legal system honors the concept of self defense.)

Not for the fetus…

Huh??

[TheDoctorIsIn]

A thread on the Hannity message boards entirely deflected to the same endless and pointless debate on abortion?

What is this, 2007?

[PAmoderate37]

@Guvnah

And this is why it’s so important for pro-aborts to hide behind the rare cases.

Human shield.

Disgusting.

Nah, you would have to encourage someone to get an abortion before your pro-abort. I just won’t deny anyone that choice in the first trimester. That said, I am fine with my position on the issue and if you need to call me “pro-abort” knock yourself out.

[CanadianJudo]

so you don’t support welfare for 15 year old mothers?

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@TheDoctorIsIn

A thread on the Hannity message boards entirely deflected to the same endless and pointless debate on abortion?

What is this, 2007?

How many million children were ripped apart in the womb since then?

[Jezcoe]

@Guvnah

@Jezcoe

@Guvnah

I would consider it a fool’s errand to attempt to enact an abortion restriction without those exceptions.

So no. …

No, I didn’t say that.

I said what I believe would be the only passable restriction possible.

So you do think that the State should deny a 15 year old rape victim a termination of her pregnancy.

Got ya.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Call_me_Ishmael

How many million children were ripped apart in the womb since then?

How many poor threads on this message board were needlessly killed by the same old vapid and emotional deflection?

Think of the threads.

[DMK]

@CanadianJudo

so you don’t support welfare for 15 year old mothers?

Personally, I don’t. I’m not even sure if a 15 year old qualifies for welfare.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Jezcoe

@Guvnah

@Jezcoe

@Guvnah

I would consider it a fool’s errand to attempt to enact an abortion restriction without those exceptions.

So no. …

No, I didn’t say that.

I said what I believe would be the only passable restriction possible.

So you do think that the State should deny a 15 year old rape victim a termination of her pregnancy.

Got ya.

Not the business of the state

[DMK]

@Jezcoe

So you do think that the State should deny a 15 year old rape victim a termination of her pregnancy.

Got ya.

Back to the topic at hand. Should the rapist be set free because he can’t afford the bail?

[PAmoderate37]

@DMK

Back to the topic at hand. Should the rapist be set free because he can’t afford the bail?

Why should a rapist who can afford bail be set free?

[DMK]

@PAmoderate37

Why should a rapist who can afford bail be set free?

Should be or is?

[PAmoderate37]

@DMK

Should be or is?

This is the crux of the argument. Two men both accused of rape. One is wealthy and one is poor. Either they should both be held until trial or neither should be held until they are convicted. One or the other. Not one justice system for the rich and one for the poor.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

Back to the topic at hand. Should the rapist be set free because he can’t afford the bail?

If bail is granted - then yes. Absolutely.

If the position of the court on whether the person should be released or not is based only on whether they can afford to pay, then they should be released.

This is what innocent until proven guilty means.

[DMK]

@PAmoderate37

This is the crux of the argument. Two men both accused of rape. One is wealthy and one is poor. Either they should both be held until trial or neither should be held until they are convicted. One or the other. Not one justice system for the rich and one for the poor.

Both get a trial. Both are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

[PAmoderate37]

@DMK

Both get a trial. Both are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

True, but if facts are the same money should not determine whether you are free until your trial date or in jail until your trial date.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

Both get a trial. Both are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

And one gets to wait for his trial at home, and the other gets to wait in jail.

That’s the point.

[DMK]

@PAmoderate37

True, but if facts are the same money should not determine whether you are free until your trial date or in jail until your trial date.

Facts aren’t the same. Ergo, bail is based upon the prosecutor, defense attorney and the judge in the case.

[DMK]

@TheDoctorIsIn

And one gets to wait for his trial at home, and the other gets to wait in jail.

That’s the point.

No, it really isn’t the point.