If there was truly a disinformation board they would have to censure pretty much everything Brandon and company say as they seldom if ever tell the truth.
Jankowicz also suggested that the negative feedback she receives from men online violates her “basic democratic and human rights” and is meant to “silence” her and other women, concluding that comments from men “change how women engage online.”
Interesting. Sounds like the new Minister of Truthiness believes being online is a basic right?
I don’t think this position will require Senate advice and consent?
Funny how libs here says you have no right concerning online and private corporations etc…then libs misinformation czar says it is. So my question for forum libs…which is it?
I suspect that one reason for the wailing about Musk buying Twitter is that he is effectively buying evidence.
Emails or other communications may show that Twitter censorship was coerced, not merely directed. That is why Democrats are panicking.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . . They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both
There are plenty of powerful people who do not want free speech.
Posting videos that show the position of military forces may threaten the troops. Posting videos after an attack may be a threat to the government’s narrative. Either way the government views the videos as a threat.