What party/ideology no longer believes in democracy?
Wiki? LOL
I guessed that you agreed with Obama. His tweet “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.”
This is extremely deceitful. It’s from a study by members of an activist group, “Skeptical Science” which exists to promote public acceptance of AGW.
After follow up analysis of the 12,000 papers, it ended up that less than 1% actually expressed a view. None addressed it being dangerous or a crisis or anything close to Obama’s tweet. How did they get 97%? Dishonest twisting of statistics by activists and politicians.
2 Likes
Yeah, Wiki.
It is better than any link you have ever posted.
Anyone who supports this Disinformation Governance Board is a class a moron.
4 Likes
That was the first analysis.
You can edit on wiki. Put anything you want to.
Crittin’
There we go…
Too late.
How do you know that is disinformation?
“Oversight” of what?
Name one relevant to this discussion.
A government fact checking clearing house for government “facts”.
1 Like
No position.
So you say.
This chick is an idiot.
And a prime peddler if dis information…
An incompetent dimwit…sounds perfect for the Biden administration.
5 Likes
Oh?
Disinfo Chief is disinfo personiffied.
1 Like
1,Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+% : 64
2,Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimize: 922
3,Implicitly endorses AGW without minimizing it: 2910
4,No Position: 7970
5,Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW: 54
6,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify: 15
7,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50%: 9
So 64 out of 11,944, or 0.5%, take the view that humans are the main cause of global warming. But that includes all abstracts, including those that did not take a position. It would be nice to take the 64 as a percent of those that did take a position. Unfortunately, in their data set, Cook et al put 4a, those that do not address the cause of global warming, with 4b, those that express the view that humans’ role in global warming is uncertain or undefined. It would be nice to separate them, but we can’t unless we have the even rawer data. So let’s generously conclude that everyone in category 4 has expressed no view. That’s a total of 7970, leaving a total of 3,974 that have expressed a view. The 64 who think the main cause is humans is, drum roll please: 1.6%.
1.6% is pretty different from 97%.
2 Likes
Break out the popcorn ladies and gentlemen, this is about to start getting good.
First task of Dis-Information Governance Board: convince migrants the US border is closed.
