no, that would be 2000 they have not yet applied for permits on. there are 536 available rigs in the US and 7000 leases needing permits that have been applied for. is applying for the other 2000 or so permits going to change anything?
already did, not surprised you ignore it
which is meaningless. they’ve been included in lots of budgets under lots of presidents. they’re budget gimmicks. i believe the congressionally mandated sales while trump was president would be executed in 2026 ans 2027… are we there yet?
your motte again, its irrelevant to the 9000 leases brandon keeps talking about.
Ok, so let’s assume those numbers are correct. 2000 leases that why haven’t applied for permits. That’s Biden’s fault? Remember, most leases are on private land (not subject to permitting by the Feds), not public (Federal).
Actually, had you read my post you would have seen that mandates saws passed under Trump start in 2022. So yes, we are there.
Here it is again…
irrelevant.
i separated the list into two categories
those ordered by the executive (which happen now)
and those mandated by congressional mandate (which are budget gimmicks to show lower deficits for a time that hasn’t come yet)
Rodeo
229
Good. For the most part I only respond to your material when you misrepresent mine. Which you gave done twice now.
Respectfully…tell the truth we won’t have any problems.
Have a nice day.
where did i say that was brandon’s fault?
oh wait… i didn’t, thats just you being dishonest about what i post
and again with your motte. brandon isn’t carping about leases on private land, he’s lying about leases on federal lands.
What? You responded that the sales didn’t start until 2025 and when I showed your error and sales were occurring in 2022 now you’re saying it is irrelevant? That seems a tad…dishonest. 
It would help if you could differentiate between a period and a question mark. A question mark is a question, often used to obtain clarification from another person.
I didn’t say you said that but it looks like we both agree that oil companies not applying for permits is not Biden’s fault.
Also, you seem obsessed about these public land leases as if they can answer our supply crunch. Do you acknowledge they cannot?
Rodeo
234
The statement was presented as “you agree with the SPR release. I never once said I did so why would you ask the question other than to change the meaning, aka lie about what I said.
Don’t lie about my comments and we won’t have a problem.
My fuse with the entire liberal left is pretty short, when y’all just make stuff up I have no interest in putting up with it.
Bye bye then.
and it was like every other congressionally mandated sale a budget gimmick. have the 7 or so million bbl’s to be sold under the act this year been sold yet?
It was a question? All you had to do was say “No, I don’t.” Instead you claimed I lied when all I did was ask a question. That seems a bit dishonest but I’m not going to have a fit about it.
no, i responded that i believed that to be the case. you do know what “i believe” means i assume. just more dishonesty from you
Am I mistaken that this would be voted on by the Dem controlled House and the GOP controlled Senate and then signed by the GOP President?
Fine. And then when I corrected you, you then claimed the data you were discussing suddenly became “irrelevant”. Had you initially felt it was irrelevant you would have led with that. But now it suddenly becomes “irrelevant” when the dates don’t support you. 
no, i don’t. there are 5000 leases with permits pending. what could be produced from them if blm would get off the stick and approve the permits? there are at least 2000 in litigation also.
brandon could do something about the 5000. he hasn’t. he just keeps going on about the leases they aren’t drilling on without acknowledging that until blm approves the permits, they can’t
just more dishonesty from you.
I was honest. i separated the list into executive actions and congressional actions.
those the Presidents have done on their own they are 100% responsible for.
those enacted in legislation they are marginally responsible for. not only are they only marginally responsible, but for the most part they are budget gimmicks and may not ever happen. all presidents sign legislation, they are not responsible for writing it, and many sign legislation with many parts they don’t support, but sign it because of other parts they do. its a shared responsibility falling mostly on the congress. especially when its just in the budget, which is not binding, and the sales may never occur.
you are trying to make trump responsible for the acts of congress in some silly whataboutism play. he is no more responsible for that than obama was for the same things happening in 2015/16. those acts (budget gimmicks) were enacted by the congress. did you see me try to make obama responsible for them?
