Biden compiling an enemies list

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T14:20:47.862Z

An investigation into January 6. Again my issue is how they are going about doing it

This requires court orders imo

It’s not enemy list.

Zippy · 2024-01-19T14:35:25.678Z

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Sure it is.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T14:38:15.633Z

Zippy:

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Sure it is.

Then why is it restricted to those dates?

Why make it so narrow.

If one were making an enemy list wouldn’t it be nationwide and all the time

Wouldn’t it be easier to simply collect data on anyone saying let’s go Brandon

Your conclusion falls apart at even the barest of inspections.

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:01:53.340Z

TheDoctorIsIn:

They’d need a warrant to demand it. But there’s nothing stopping them from asking.

Ignoring the underlying threat of violence always present in agents of the state.

Same true of “asking” for ID cookies from youths of color on a street corner?

The regulatory state is real.

Nemesis · 2024-01-19T15:06:27.905Z

Zippy:

I can almost see the MAGA thing as leftists stand firmly against making America great. But to request information on people who purchase bibles? Really?

Shouldn’t be surprised I guess. Still disturbing. biden focuses the intelligence community inwardly towards fellow Americans.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is blowing up.

Unreal.

The bible bit was supposition but I agree there is no reason why terms such as MAGA should be flagged. That bothers me greatly and this administration needs to explain itself.

TheDoctorIsIn · 2024-01-19T15:07:36.828Z

WuWei:

Ignoring the underlying threat of violence always present in agents of the state.

Same true of “asking” for ID cookies from youths of color on a street corner?

The regulatory state is real.

I don’t really disagree with you, aside from the argyle-bargle about the “regulatory state.”

But as far as I’m concerned, the onus is on the banks to say No. Come back with a warrant.

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:20:19.333Z

Argle-bargle. You don’t believe the US is a regulatory state? Seriously?

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:21:04.414Z

TheDoctorIsIn:

But as far as I’m concerned, the onus is on the banks to say No. Come back with a warrant.

And when they do?

RTchoke · 2024-01-19T18:11:34.511Z

Nemesis:

Zippy:

I can almost see the MAGA thing as leftists stand firmly against making America great. But to request information on people who purchase bibles? Really?

Shouldn’t be surprised I guess. Still disturbing. biden focuses the intelligence community inwardly towards fellow Americans.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is blowing up.

Unreal.

The bible bit was supposition but I agree there is no reason why terms such as MAGA should be flagged. That bothers me greatly and this administration needs to explain itself.

And as we have seen these past years, that will never happen. KJP will stand there and blame Republicans, Biden will ignore it entirely as he slurps another milkshake, and the enforcement elites will double down, all while sycophants will continue with the whole ‘no biggie, the banks did it on their own’.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T18:29:59.115Z

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Not yet.
Right now it’s just a list of people who did any banking in DC that week.

No doubt it will be cross-referenced with something (such as being a southerner, being an outspoke conservative etc…) and people on the remaining list
will not be given an ice cream sundae.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T18:31:11.539Z

And then off to the fema camps with you

Slippery slopes is for when it’s snowing or raining.

Not for imagination.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T19:11:42.159Z

FreeAndClear:

And then off to the fema camps with you

Slippery slopes is for when it’s snowing or raining.

Not for imagination.

Well, you are correct that we do not know what the list is for.
For fun, we can imagine what the list is for,
but in honesty, we do not know what the Joe Biden Justice Department
will do with a list of MAGA-related people who visited DC from out of state around Jan 6.

Maybe the DoJ wants to give them all $1 million each, right?
Maybe DoJ is hoping they will testify “The Capital police politely escorted us around and tried to open doors for us” so DoJ can overturn the earlier verdicts

We really don’t know what Joe Biden’s DoJ will do with this list.
Heck it could be a friends list, right?

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T20:20:35.199Z

Right or it could be an abuse of power that should have been submitted for judicial review. That would be a constitutional violation

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it. I really recommend for you guys rival Harry Turtledovr with your fervent imaginations.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T20:38:51.264Z

FreeAndClear:

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it.

Kindly list for me three “something good” or “something neutral” reasons Joe Biden might be doing this.

Adam · 2024-01-19T20:43:53.239Z

Gaius:

FreeAndClear:

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it.

Kindly list for me three “something good” or “something neutral” reasons Joe Biden might be doing this.

Well, Joe Biden isn’t personally doing anything. But the Justice Department is probably trying to identify people who broke into the Capitol. Kind of like watching store security footage.

RTchoke · 2024-01-19T20:49:30.788Z

By targeting someone who bought a duck call at Dick’s Sporting Goods?

Let’s crawl through your bank records and see what we can find to charge you with based on your purchases.

WuWei · 2024-01-19T21:12:11.858Z

soup nazi social credits500×625 67.5 KB

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T21:40:02.136Z

Gaius:

FreeAndClear:

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it.

Kindly list for me three “something good” or “something neutral” reasons Joe Biden might be doing this.

He is investigating the Jan 6 riot. I think wait let me check yep like fourth time i said that.

Why three? There is just that one reason

The fact that you think there should be more than one is so very very telling

Piper · 2024-01-19T23:35:43.583Z

Nemesis:

The bible bit was supposition but I agree there is no reason why terms such as MAGA should be flagged. That bothers me greatly and this administration needs to explain itself.

According to the House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, which falls under the jurisdiction of the House Judiciary Committee, federal law enforcement agencies partnered with a number of financial institutions to flag transactions with the terms “MAGA,” “Trump” and more. They also monitored transactions at stores like Cabela’s and Bass Pro Shop. Other purchases linked to religious texts, like Christian bibles, were flagged under the guise of “preventing extremism.”

What was that again about Supposition?

townhall.com – 17 Jan 24

The Feds Worked With Banks to Flag Purchases of Bibles, 'Extremist' Text

Piper · 2024-01-19T23:44:59.058Z

FreeAndClear:

An investigation into January 6. Again my issue is how they are going about doing it

This requires court orders imo

It’s not enemy list.

" …while Jan. 6, 2021, was the “impetus” for the queries and searches, none of the documents the committee has obtained reveal any specific time frames or limitations for banks searching customer transactions with the terms. The source said the federal government used the information for investigations beyond Jan. 6."

Fox News

Okay now?