Biden compiling an enemies list

Bill.in.PA · 2024-01-18T19:44:37.490Z

Biden looks at the articles of impeachment against Nixon as his can-you-top-this list.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-18T20:18:33.570Z

Zippy:

FreeAndClear:

The cartoonish view of your political opposites

Well now.

That us a very good description of the left.

Cartoonish.

I mean where else can men become women.

Where else is lithium mining better for the environment than drilling oil.

Where else are EV’s a reasonable substitute for ice cars (Chicago)

Where else are Ev’s considered clean even though the electricity supply to charge them comes from oil.

Where else does the person who implemented vax mandates snd EV mandates and spies on Americans call his opponent “authoritarian “.

Only in the cartoon world of libbyland. Thats where.

Okie. Thank you for the stream of consciousness.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-18T20:19:12.187Z

Bill.in.PA:

Biden looks at the articles of impeachment against Nixon as his can-you-top-this list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO23WBji_Z0

What is impeachable about this?

Let’s hear the details.

Bill.in.PA · 2024-01-18T21:54:14.082Z

What was considered outrageous and impeachable in 1974 has become business as usual by Democrats and their allies in Washington. A White House enemies list is the just a snowball on the tip of the iceberg.

Here are a few examples:

Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States . . .

Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States . . .

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law . . .

He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office . . .

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit . . .

He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities . . .

He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities . . .

. . .contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives . . .

Articles of Impeachment Adopted by the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary | The American Presidency Project

Nixon’s alleged crimes were a nothingburger compared to what the corruption that is now rampant in Washington.

TheDoctorIsIn · 2024-01-19T04:17:54.553Z

Zander:

Looks like it.

But still seems problematic they asked banks for purchases info?

Wouldn’t they need a warrant for that?

They’d need a warrant to demand it. But there’s nothing stopping them from asking.

Piper · 2024-01-19T07:11:27.228Z

FreeAndClear:

Not to me to reality. They were investigating people who were in the area. The way they did it is a problem in and of itself. Calling that an ememy list is nothing but histrionics.

Years later they are still doing it. What else would you call lists of every person’s name that mentions Trump, MAGA or the Bible?

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T14:20:47.862Z

An investigation into January 6. Again my issue is how they are going about doing it

This requires court orders imo

It’s not enemy list.

Zippy · 2024-01-19T14:35:25.678Z

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Sure it is.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T14:38:15.633Z

Zippy:

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Sure it is.

Then why is it restricted to those dates?

Why make it so narrow.

If one were making an enemy list wouldn’t it be nationwide and all the time

Wouldn’t it be easier to simply collect data on anyone saying let’s go Brandon

Your conclusion falls apart at even the barest of inspections.

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:01:53.340Z

TheDoctorIsIn:

They’d need a warrant to demand it. But there’s nothing stopping them from asking.

Ignoring the underlying threat of violence always present in agents of the state.

Same true of “asking” for ID cookies from youths of color on a street corner?

The regulatory state is real.

Nemesis · 2024-01-19T15:06:27.905Z

Zippy:

I can almost see the MAGA thing as leftists stand firmly against making America great. But to request information on people who purchase bibles? Really?

Shouldn’t be surprised I guess. Still disturbing. biden focuses the intelligence community inwardly towards fellow Americans.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is blowing up.

Unreal.

The bible bit was supposition but I agree there is no reason why terms such as MAGA should be flagged. That bothers me greatly and this administration needs to explain itself.

TheDoctorIsIn · 2024-01-19T15:07:36.828Z

WuWei:

Ignoring the underlying threat of violence always present in agents of the state.

Same true of “asking” for ID cookies from youths of color on a street corner?

The regulatory state is real.

I don’t really disagree with you, aside from the argyle-bargle about the “regulatory state.”

But as far as I’m concerned, the onus is on the banks to say No. Come back with a warrant.

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:20:19.333Z

Argle-bargle. You don’t believe the US is a regulatory state? Seriously?

WuWei · 2024-01-19T15:21:04.414Z

TheDoctorIsIn:

But as far as I’m concerned, the onus is on the banks to say No. Come back with a warrant.

And when they do?

RTchoke · 2024-01-19T18:11:34.511Z

Nemesis:

Zippy:

I can almost see the MAGA thing as leftists stand firmly against making America great. But to request information on people who purchase bibles? Really?

Shouldn’t be surprised I guess. Still disturbing. biden focuses the intelligence community inwardly towards fellow Americans.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is blowing up.

Unreal.

The bible bit was supposition but I agree there is no reason why terms such as MAGA should be flagged. That bothers me greatly and this administration needs to explain itself.

And as we have seen these past years, that will never happen. KJP will stand there and blame Republicans, Biden will ignore it entirely as he slurps another milkshake, and the enforcement elites will double down, all while sycophants will continue with the whole ‘no biggie, the banks did it on their own’.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T18:29:59.115Z

FreeAndClear:

It’s not enemy list.

Not yet.
Right now it’s just a list of people who did any banking in DC that week.

No doubt it will be cross-referenced with something (such as being a southerner, being an outspoke conservative etc…) and people on the remaining list
will not be given an ice cream sundae.

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T18:31:11.539Z

And then off to the fema camps with you

Slippery slopes is for when it’s snowing or raining.

Not for imagination.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T19:11:42.159Z

FreeAndClear:

And then off to the fema camps with you

Slippery slopes is for when it’s snowing or raining.

Not for imagination.

Well, you are correct that we do not know what the list is for.
For fun, we can imagine what the list is for,
but in honesty, we do not know what the Joe Biden Justice Department
will do with a list of MAGA-related people who visited DC from out of state around Jan 6.

Maybe the DoJ wants to give them all $1 million each, right?
Maybe DoJ is hoping they will testify “The Capital police politely escorted us around and tried to open doors for us” so DoJ can overturn the earlier verdicts

We really don’t know what Joe Biden’s DoJ will do with this list.
Heck it could be a friends list, right?

FreeAndClear · 2024-01-19T20:20:35.199Z

Right or it could be an abuse of power that should have been submitted for judicial review. That would be a constitutional violation

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it. I really recommend for you guys rival Harry Turtledovr with your fervent imaginations.

Gaius · 2024-01-19T20:38:51.264Z

FreeAndClear:

But no it has to be something wicked. It has to be. Because a democrat is doing it.

Kindly list for me three “something good” or “something neutral” reasons Joe Biden might be doing this.