This is an analysis of a copy of the hard drive from the Delaware shop. They did not chose to have the actual drive analyzed for reasons that should be obvious to anyone who isn’t desperately trying to deflect attention to the Bidens.
Back in the Brezhnev era of the Soviet Union, the state sent dissidents to psychiatric hospitals on the grounds that opposition to the regime was a mental illness. So you stand in very good company with your Soviet model.
Of course the goal was to avoid debating opponents, because the Soviets had nothing to bring to a discussion.
What is being called derangement here is much the same, a cowardly hiding from debate by “medicalizing” dissent.
1 Like
there is a clearly definable difference for anyone who has a scintilla of objectivity.
for instance the way the maniac press and media reacted to trump’s slow walk down the ramp with invoking 25th, unfit etc.
Biden near daily stumbles, bumbles. trips, falls, gaffes, confusion, falling asleep or near, and other serial twilighty moments not a flippin word from formerly hysteria media
so yeah OKIE, big gigantic difference
the pink hairs need help. but they’re in govt
it’s a problem
when the speaker threatens to punch the president, thats how you know there’s pathology in that rage
That’s not objectivity talking. That’s pure bias if only because not a flipping word is wrong. Just not as maniacal as you want it to be. This whole unbiased and objective shtick is sad because there is nothing wrong with being subjective or biased. Trying to deny it is silly
The slow walking down the ramp was the punditry not media on the whole. That you can’t tell the difference is telling
That being said. Sure the media handles Biden with a soft touch. There is no way around it but you want hair ripping and sky screaming.
Pure observation through your allegedly objective prism. There is nothing wrong with bias.
it is a simple matter of what really is
i noticed you didnt deny it
So you don’t think there is a difference between an original and a copy?
And the CBS report not the only analysis.
I respect that you have faith in reports in the mainstream media and have not noticed their liberal bias.
But consider three messages from Hunter Biden’s I-Cloud account. All of these were generated on days when Biden was in rehab and not allowed access to his devices:
"9/1/18: The following changes to your Apple ID, rhb@rspdc.com were made on September 1, 2018 at 10:29:36 AM PDT: Password
9/11/18: The password for your Apple ID (rhb@rspdc.com) has been successfully reset.
9/11/18: Robert’s iPad is being erased. The erase of Robert’s iPad started at 2:56 PM PDT on August 5, 2018."
Since you are talking about cybersecurity, provide any explanation that can show why this is not evidence a foreign entity hacked Hunter Biden’s I-Cloud so that they could copy the drive and then took steps to cover their traces?
Or, if Hunter Biden had access to his devices on that day, why would any iCloud user take such an action, particularly backdating the erasure?
prove it wasn’t hacked?
cute
“prove you never got your amazon package”.
still believe it was the russians who planted all them pics of hunter with his crack and illegal guns and hookers?
2 Likes
STODR
1074
H believes the shop owner should have done the work for the FBI.
2 Likes
I didn’t ask you prove anything, I asked you to provide an alternative explanation for messages on Hunter Biden’s I-Cloud account that would suggest strong to anyone who knows cybersecurity that the account was hacked.
If you don’t have an alternate explanation that increases the credibility of conclusion that is was hacked.
I never said Russians planted the pictures that the right wing to enjoy so much. They were Hunter Biden’s on his iCloud account and there is no doubt that at least some of the material on the laptop that was conveniently dropped off 2500 miles from where Hunter lives, “forgotten about”, and then delivered to Rudy Guiliani contained some actual Hunter Biden materials. But it also contained a great deal that appears to have been put on the drive by third parties.
If you want to have people believe it was not real, you have to be able to explain all the manipulation of metadata on the drive.
I know you want it to be real, but wishing and hoping does not create make the evidence that this drive was substantially manipulated after it got to the Repair Shop in Delaware.
it does no such thing
this is you gaslighting about the veracity (or lack thereof) of the contents.
sorry. but no tampering.
it’s all as it appears
I am providing data from “the laptop” which most likely is at it appears. I realize this disappoints you, but I have offered you the chance to explain how this is not evidence of tampering and you are unable or unwilling to do so. Simply stating “no tampering” is not a meaningful response to this evidence.
This does not mean you cannot get off on looking at Hunter’s porno if that floats your boat, but you are probably looking at stolen property.
You are gaslighting yourself by denying the evidence. I am merely the bearer of bad tidings here.
you can stop this silly attempt to gaslight this
from my link:
“Computer Forensics Services’ chief technology officer, Mark Lanterman, said he believes it’s clear the data was created by Hunter Biden.“
you’d think this would be big news.
“I have no doubt in my mind that this data was created by Hunter Biden, and that it came from a computer under Mr. Biden’s control," he said.
In addition to analyzing the records’ underlying data for potential anomalies, the audit also identified multiple voicemails apparently from future President Biden.“
ok i know i know….”show how this isnt fake”
damn, people realize this huh?
go tell everyone
4 Likes
Samm
1079
If you understood logic, the truism that lack of evidence does not disprove a hypothesis is all the evidence I need to show that your position is illogical. No insult; just logic.
2 Likes
DougBH
1080
Information on the laptop should be corroborated before used for an impeachment. Like maybe a witness to discussions about bribe payments on a government form. Or actual payments being made. Or those payments, which the informant said would be laundered being actually laundered through fake corporations. Or by evidence that Biden really did aid Burisma by getting rid of an investigator of Burisma which was evidenced by Biden bragging on video that he got rid of an investigator of Burisma.
And all the while, let’s not forget the years long investigation of collusion with Russia was based on “credible accusations”. That is the established standard.
1 Like
You do know the original laptop was picked up by the DOJ long before Rudy received a copy, right?
2 Likes
